Laurie Reynolds v. Howard McGillin, et al
| LAURIE NICOLE REYNOLDS |
| HOWARD O. MCGILLIN, JOHN M. ALEXANDER, ST. JOHNS COUNTY FLORIDA FAMILY COURT, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, MARK REYNOLDS, EMILY EARNEST, DEANA DUNCAN, LARRY CRANE, LISA BURNETT and RICHARD THIBAULT |
| 25-11232 |
| April 8, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Laurie Nicole Reynolds. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [13] [25-11232] (ECF: Laurie Reynolds) [Entered: 06/14/2025 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 12 This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in this Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 06/10/2025 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 11 Notice that no action will be taken on Brief at DE# 9 filed by Appellant Laurie Nicole Reynolds. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements.Additionally, the brief is premature See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1.. [Entered: 05/27/2025 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 10 USDC order: ORDER denying Motion to Reopen Case as to Appellant Laurie Nicole Reynolds was filed on 05/19/2025. Docket Entry 18. [Entered: 05/19/2025 01:03 PM] |
| Filing 9 Appellant's brief filed by Laurie Nicole Reynolds. [25-11232] (ECF: Laurie Reynolds) [Entered: 05/16/2025 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 8 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for extension to file Amicus Brief [ # 7 ] filed by Appellant Laurie Nicole Reynolds. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): This is not a motion for extension to file Amicus Brief. It is a Court Reporter Extension form. Additionally, the filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1.. [Entered: 05/15/2025 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION for extension of time to file Amicus brief to 05/15/2025 pursuant to FRAP 29(a) filed by Laurie Reynolds. [7] [25-11232] (ECF: Laurie Reynolds) [Entered: 05/15/2025 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 6 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Laurie Nicole Reynolds was filed on 05/06/2025. Docket Entry 17. [Entered: 05/06/2025 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 5 USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Laurie Nicole Reynolds was filed on 04/28/2025. Docket Entry 15. [Entered: 04/30/2025 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party Laurie Nicole Reynolds. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 04/30/2025 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 3 USDC order: MOTION to Reopen Case by Laurie Reynolds. as to Appellant Laurie Nicole Reynolds was filed on 04/08/2025. Docket Entry 13. [Entered: 04/30/2025 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Party Laurie Nicole Reynolds. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-11232] (ECF: Laurie Reynolds) [Entered: 04/23/2025 09:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Laurie Reynolds on 04/08/2025. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/05/2025 as to Appellant Laurie Reynolds. [Entered: 04/15/2025 02:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.