Joseph Luter, IV v. Scheepswerf Groot-Ammers B.V.
| JOSEPH LUTER, IV |
| SCHEEPSWERF GROOT-AMMERS B.V. |
| 25-11343 |
| April 18, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Joseph Luter, IV failed to file a Civil Appeal Statement form and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 06/09/2025 03:26 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Plaintiff/Appellant's Notice of Settlement and Voluntary Dismissal of Appeal filed by Attorney James Weller Stroup for Appellant Joseph Luter, IV. [25-11343] (ECF: James Stroup) [Entered: 05/16/2025 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 4 Farris J. Martin, III for Appellant Joseph Luter, IV and James Weller Stroup for Appellant Joseph Luter, IV is notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files a Civil Appeal Statement. [Entered: 05/14/2025 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Farris J. Martin, III for Joseph Luter, IV and James Weller Stroup for Joseph Luter, IV. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website and have not filed the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). [Entered: 05/14/2025 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 2 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Joseph Luter, IV. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files in the District Court a completed Transcript Order Form OR a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered. [Entered: 05/14/2025 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Joseph Luter, IV on 04/16/2025. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/12/2025 as to Appellant Joseph Luter IV. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/21/2025 as to Appellee Scheepswerf Groot-Ammers B.V. [Entered: 04/23/2025 03:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Joseph Luter, IV v. Scheepswerf Groot-Ammers B.V. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOSEPH LUTER, IV | |
| Represented By: | James Weller Stroup |
| Represented By: | Farris J. Martin III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SCHEEPSWERF GROOT-AMMERS B.V. | |
| Represented By: | Steven Murray Weinger |
| Represented By: | Peter Francis Valori |
| Represented By: | Allison Jade Leonard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.