Timothy Kinner v. FDOC Director, et al
| TIMOTHY KINNER |
| FDOC DIRECTOR, JOHNSON, C. WYNN, SCOTT, R. PHILIPS, R. WALKER, SWARTZROCK, HINKLE, MARCIC THOMAS, WARDEN JANE DOE, HAZEL, CENTURION, RN JANE DOE and FDOC SECRETARY |
| 25-11501 |
| May 1, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Timothy Kinner has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 10/17/2025 08:39 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Motion for leave to proceed based on imminent danger filed by Appellant Timothy Kinner is DENIED. [ # 3 ] BCG (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 09/24/2025 12:02 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Timothy Kinner. [Entered: 05/23/2025 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party Timothy Kinner. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 05/23/2025 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION for leave to proceed based on imminent danger filed by Appellant Timothy Kinner. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [3] [Entered: 05/05/2025 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 2 Letter received from Appellant Timothy Kinner in appeal designated as 3 strikes. [Entered: 05/02/2025 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Timothy Kinner on 04/28/2025. Fee Status: Three Strikes. [Entered: 05/02/2025 12:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
