David Foley, Jr., et al v. Orange County, et al
| DAVID WASH FOLEY, JR. and JENNIFER T. FOLEY |
| ORANGE COUNTY, ASIMA M. AZAM, TIM BOLDIG, FRED BRUMMER, RICHARD CROTTY, FRANK DETOMA, MILDRED FERNANDEZ, MITCH GORDON, TARA GOULD and CAROL HOSSFIELD |
| 25-11615 |
| May 13, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| David Foley, Jr., et al v. Orange County, et al |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
Mandate issued as to Appellants David Wash Foley, Jr. and Jennifer T. Foley. [Entered: 10/07/2025 10:46 AM]
|
Filing 24
ORDER: Petition for panel rehearing only filed by Appellant David Wash Foley, Jr. is DENIED. [24] [Entered: 09/29/2025 02:23 PM]
|
Filing 23
Received FOUR paper copies of pro se E-PFR and APPENDIX to E-PFR filed by Appellants David Wash Foley, Jr. and Jennifer T. Foley. [Entered: 09/17/2025 11:39 AM]
|
Filing 22
Petition for panel rehearing only filed by Appellant David Wash Foley, Jr.. [25-11615] (ECF: David Foley) [Entered: 09/15/2025 01:29 PM]
|
Filing 21
ORDER: The motion for an extension of time to and including September 15, 2025, to file Appellants petition for rehearing is GRANTED. [ # 19 ] ENTERED FOR THE COURT - BY DIRECTION. (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 08/26/2025 03:39 PM]
|
Filing 20
RESPONSE to Motion for extension to file request for rehearing filed by Appellant David Wash Foley, Jr. [ # 19 ] filed by Attorney Jessica Christy Conner for Appellees Tim Boldig, Mitch Gordon, Tara Gould and Carol Hossfield. [25-11615] (ECF: Jessica Conner) [Entered: 08/22/2025 03:55 PM]
|
Filing 19
MOTION for extension of time to file request for rehearing to 09/15/2025 filed by David Wash Foley, Jr.. Motion is Opposed. [19] [25-11615] (ECF: David Foley) [Entered: 08/12/2025 07:31 PM]
|
Filing 18
Judgment entered as to Appellants David Wash Foley, Jr. and Jennifer T. Foley. [Entered: 07/28/2025 09:31 AM]
|
Filing 17
Opinion issued by court as to Appellants David Wash Foley, Jr. and Jennifer T. Foley. Decision: Dismissed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link # http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions . [Entered: 07/28/2025 09:22 AM]
|
Filing 16
Appellant's brief filed by David Wash Foley, Jr.. [25-11615] (ECF: David Foley) [Entered: 07/23/2025 02:18 PM]
|
Filing 15
Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellees Tim Boldig, Mitch Gordon, Tara Gould and Carol Hossfield [25-11615] (ECF: Jessica Conner) [Entered: 06/25/2025 05:53 PM]
|
Filing 14
Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellant David Wash Foley, Jr. [25-11615] (ECF: David Foley) [Entered: 06/25/2025 05:26 PM]
|
Filing 13
Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to David Wash Foley, Jr. and Jennifer T. Foley. Appellants' brief due on 07/23/2025 as to Appellants David Wash Foley Jr. and Jennifer T. Foley. Appendix due on 07/30/2025 as to Appellants David Wash Foley Jr. and Jennifer T. Foley. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 06/18/2025 10:14 AM]
|
Filing 12
JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to David Wash Foley, Jr. and Jennifer T. Foley. [Entered: 06/11/2025 04:30 PM]
|
Filing 11
Briefing Notice issued to Appellants David Wash Foley, Jr. and Jennifer T. Foley. The appellant's brief is due on or before 06/23/2025. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 06/05/2025 02:18 PM]
|
Filing 10
TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party David Wash Foley, Jr.. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 06/05/2025 02:17 PM]
|
Filing 9
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Lee Bernbaum for Appellee Orange County. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-11615] (ECF: Lee Bernbaum) [Entered: 06/03/2025 03:28 PM]
|
Filing 8
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lee Bernbaum for Orange County. Related cases? Yes. [25-11615] (ECF: Lee Bernbaum) [Entered: 06/03/2025 10:55 AM]
|
Filing 7
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Derek Angell, Esq., for "Officials" Asima Azam, Fred Brummer, Richard Crotty, Frank Detoma, Mildred Fernandez, Teresa Jacobs, Roderick Love, Scott Richman, Joe Roberts, Marcus Robinson, Tiffany Rusell, Bill Segal, and Linda Stewart Derek J. Angell for Asima M. Azam, Fred Brummer, Richard Crotty, Frank Detoma and Mildred Fernandez. Related cases? Yes. [25-11615] (ECF: Derek Angell) [Entered: 05/28/2025 01:28 PM]
|
Filing 6
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by "Officials" Asima Azam, Fred Brummer, Richard Crotty, Frank Detoma, Mildred Fernandez, Teresa Jacobs, Roderick Love, Scott Richman, Joe Roberts, Marcus Robinson, Tiffany Russell, Bill Segal, and Linda Stewart Attorney Derek J. Angell for Appellees Asima M. Azam, Fred Brummer, Richard Crotty, Frank Detoma and Mildred Fernandez. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-11615] (ECF: Derek Angell) [Entered: 05/28/2025 01:23 PM]
|
Filing 5
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Jessica Christy Conner for Appellees Tim Boldig, Mitch Gordon, Tara Gould and Carol Hossfield. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-11615] (ECF: Jessica Conner) [Entered: 05/28/2025 10:40 AM]
|
Filing 4
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jessica Christy Conner for Tim Boldig, Mitch Gordon, Tara Gould and Carol Hossfield. Related cases? Yes. [25-11615] (ECF: Jessica Conner) [Entered: 05/27/2025 01:30 PM]
|
Filing 3
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by David and Jennifer Foley Party David Wash Foley, Jr.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-11615] (ECF: David Foley) [Entered: 05/22/2025 11:30 AM]
|
Filing 2
NOTICE TO PARTIES: Due to the large number of parties associated with this appeal, not all parties from the district court docket have been entered on this Court's docket at this time. The parties may consult the relevant notice(s) of appeal, other case documents, and the district court docket to identify all parties. If any party objects to not having all parties listed on the docket, the party may file an objection stating its reasoning within 14 days after the date of this notice. [Entered: 05/14/2025 10:55 AM]
|
Filing 1
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants David Wash Foley, Jr. and Jennifer T. Foley on 05/09/2025. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/02/2025 as to Appellant David Wash Foley Jr.. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/10/2025 as to Appellees Asima M. Azam, Orange County and Tim Boldig. [Entered: 05/13/2025 11:40 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.