USA v. Raymond Smith
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RAYMOND SMITH
Case Number: 25-11624
Filed: May 13, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Motion to take judicial notice filed by Appellant Raymond Smith is DENIED. [ # 11 ] KCN (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 09/12/2025 12:48 PM]
August 18, 2025 Filing 11 MOTION to take judicial notice filed by Appellant Raymond Smith. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [11] [Entered: 08/21/2025 09:45 AM]
August 8, 2025 Filing 10 Notice of receipt: Letter inquiring about appeal as to Appellant Raymond Smith.. [Entered: 08/11/2025 04:03 PM]
June 30, 2025 Filing 9 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Raymond Smith. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9] [Entered: 07/09/2025 11:18 AM]
June 4, 2025 Filing 8 The briefing schedule issued to Appellant Raymond Smith is hereby rescinded for the following reason(s): IFP has been denied in District Court.. When the above matter(s) is resolved, the clerk will issue a notice advising counsel and the parties of the new schedule for filing briefs in this appeal. [Entered: 06/04/2025 02:27 PM]
June 3, 2025 Filing 7 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Raymond Smith was filed on 06/02/2025. Docket Entry 203. [Entered: 06/03/2025 02:22 PM]
June 3, 2025 Filing 6 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Raymond Smith. The appellant's brief is due on or before 06/23/2025. [Entered: 06/03/2025 12:38 PM]
June 3, 2025 Filing 5 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Raymond Smith. [Entered: 06/03/2025 12:34 PM]
June 2, 2025 Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party Raymond Smith. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 06/02/2025 02:22 PM]
May 22, 2025 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Emily Chang for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-11624] (ECF: Emily Chang) [Entered: 05/22/2025 08:01 AM]
May 21, 2025 Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Emily C. L. Chang for U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida, U.S. Attorney Related cases? No. [25-11624] (ECF: Emily Chang) [Entered: 05/21/2025 02:04 PM]
May 13, 2025 Filing 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Raymond Smith on 05/13/2025. Fee Status: IFP Granted. [Entered: 05/15/2025 11:29 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Raymond Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida
Represented By: Emily Chang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RAYMOND SMITH
Represented By: Raymond Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?