Jorge Ruiz v. Florida Department of Corrections
| JORGE RUIZ |
| FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 25-11636 |
| May 9, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: Motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Jorge Ruiz is DENIED. [ # 5 ] ELB (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 10/31/2025 02:56 PM]
|
| Filing 11 Notice of receipt: Certificate of Interested Persons as to Appellant Jorge Ruiz. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN Fowarded from District Court. [Entered: 06/17/2025 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 10 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party Jorge Ruiz. No hearings. [Entered: 06/17/2025 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 9 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Jorge Ruiz. [Entered: 06/17/2025 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Lindsay Warner for Appellee Florida Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-11636] (ECF: Lindsay Warner) [Entered: 06/12/2025 07:42 AM] |
| Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party Jorge Ruiz. No hearings. [Entered: 06/04/2025 05:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Jorge Ruiz. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). [Entered: 06/04/2025 05:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Jorge Ruiz. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [5] [Entered: 05/22/2025 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 4 Appellate fee was paid on 05/16/2025 as to Appellant Jorge Ruiz. USDC Receipt number 20163 [Entered: 05/16/2025 01:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lindsay Ayn Warner for Florida Department of Corrections Related cases? No. [25-11636] (ECF: Lindsay Warner) [Entered: 05/16/2025 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Jorge Ruiz was filed on 04/15/2025. Docket Entry 18. [Entered: 05/15/2025 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jorge Ruiz on 05/09/2025. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 05/15/2025 09:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jorge Ruiz v. Florida Department of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JORGE RUIZ | |
| Represented By: | Jorge Ruiz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
| Represented By: | Florida Attorney General Service |
| Represented By: | Lindsay Warner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
