John Kalu v. U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner: JOHN OSCAR KALU
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 25-11859
Filed: June 2, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2025 Filing 9 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 7 ] filed by Petitioner John Oscar Kalu. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): This case is closed. [Entered: 07/02/2025 12:00 PM]
June 27, 2025 Filing 8 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Petitioner John Oscar Kalu. [Entered: 07/02/2025 11:45 AM]
June 27, 2025 Filing 7 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Petitioner John Oscar Kalu. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [Entered: 07/02/2025 11:38 AM]
June 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the petitioner John Oscar Kalu failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 06/25/2025 10:25 AM]
June 25, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to John Oscar Kalu. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). [Entered: 06/25/2025 10:19 AM]
June 23, 2025 Filing 4 BIA Record on Appeal Filed [25-11859] (ECF: DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review) [Entered: 06/23/2025 08:22 AM]
June 16, 2025 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Monica Marie Twombly for Respondent U.S. Attorney General. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-11859] (ECF: Monica Twombly) [Entered: 06/16/2025 04:16 PM]
June 3, 2025 Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Monica M. Twombly obo Respondent, Pamela Bondi Related cases? No. [25-11859] (ECF: Monica Twombly) [Entered: 06/03/2025 04:23 PM]
June 2, 2025 Filing 1 AGENCY PETITION / APPLICATION DOCKETED. Filed by Petitioner John Oscar Kalu. Additional Documents Needed: IJ Order and Notice to Appear. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 06/03/2025 03:34 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: John Kalu v. U.S. Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOHN OSCAR KALU
Represented By: John Oscar Kalu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Monica Marie Twombly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?