USA v. David Wright
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| DAVID ALAN WRIGHT |
| 25-12162 |
| June 24, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION to dismiss appeal due to valid appeal waiver filed by USA. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [15] [25-12162] (ECF: Gabriel Mendel) [Entered: 10/01/2025 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 14 SEALED Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] filed by Appellant David Alan Wright. [25-12162] (ECF: Ashley Martin) [Entered: 09/30/2025 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 13 Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Appellant David Alan Wright. [25-12162] (ECF: Ashley Martin) [Entered: 09/30/2025 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 12 Appellant's brief filed by David Alan Wright. [25-12162] (ECF: Ashley Martin) [Entered: 09/23/2025 04:59 PM] |
| Filing 11 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Ashley R. Martin for Appellant David Alan Wright. Appellants brief due on 09/24/2025 as to Appellant David Alan Wright. Appendix due 7 days after the brief is filed. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 08/21/2025 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Theodore Stuart Hertzberg for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-12162] (ECF: Theodore Hertzberg) [Entered: 07/22/2025 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 9 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant David Alan Wright. The appellant's brief is due on or before 08/25/2025. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 07/16/2025 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 8 TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Geraldine Glover, Filer: David A. Wright, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 07/16/2025, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 05/20/2025 , Plea Hearing 02/20/2025. [Entered: 07/16/2025 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 7 Court Reporter Notice of Transcripts Filed by. [25-12162] (ECF: Geraldine Glover) [Entered: 07/16/2025 08:57 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Gabriel A. Mendel for USA Related cases? No. [25-12162] (ECF: Gabriel Mendel) [Entered: 07/11/2025 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: David A. Wright, Court Reporter: Geraldine Glover, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 05/20/2025 , Plea Hearing 02/20/2025. [Entered: 07/09/2025 08:45 AM] |
| Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Ashley R. Martin for Appellant David Alan Wright. Transcript(s) ordered. [25-12162] (ECF: Ashley Martin) [Entered: 07/08/2025 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Ashley R. Martin for Appellant David Alan Wright. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-12162] (ECF: Ashley Martin) [Entered: 07/08/2025 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Theodore S. Hertzberg for USA Related cases? No. [25-12162] (ECF: Theodore Hertzberg) [Entered: 07/02/2025 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant David Alan Wright on 06/24/2025. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. [Entered: 06/25/2025 01:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
