USA v. Santander Barros-Pulido
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| SANTANDER BARROS-PULIDO, a.k.a. Pollo a.k.a. Tio a.k.a. Zeus |
| 25-12402 |
| July 15, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Appellant Santander Barros-Pulido. [25-12402] (ECF: Bryant Scriven) [Entered: 10/31/2025 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 19 Appellant Santander Barros-Pulido is notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files the appendix. If the appellant is represented by appointed counsel, the matter may be referred for consideration of possible disciplinary action against counsel in lieu of dismissal. [Entered: 10/30/2025 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 18 Amended Anders Motion [ # 17 ] filed by Appellant Santander Barros-Pulido. [25-12402] (ECF: Bryant Scriven) [Entered: 10/24/2025 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 17 Anders MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Bryant Ashley Scriven for Appellant Santander Barros-Pulido. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [17] [25-12402] (ECF: Bryant Scriven) [Entered: 10/22/2025 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 16 Appellant's Anders Brief filed by Appellant Santander Barros-Pulido. [25-12402] (ECF: Bryant Scriven) [Entered: 10/22/2025 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 15 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Santander Barros-Pulido. The appellant's brief is due on or before 10/22/2025. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 09/16/2025 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 14 TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Rebecca Sabo, Filer: Santander Barros-Pulido, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 09/12/2025, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 03/13/2025. [Entered: 09/16/2025 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 13 TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Tana J. Hess, Filer: Santander Barros-Pulido, Dt. Trans. Filed: 08/19/2025, Proceeding Type and Date: Plea Hearing 12/12/2024. [Entered: 08/20/2025 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 12 Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Transcript Order: Tana J. Hess, 08/14/2025, Santander Barros-Pulido, Plea Hearing 12/12/2024. [Entered: 08/15/2025 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 11 Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Transcript Order: Rebecca Sabo, 08/14/2025, Santander Barros-Pulido, Sentencing 03/13/2025. [Entered: 08/15/2025 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 10 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Santander Barros-Pulido, Court Reporter: Rebecca Sabo, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 03/13/2025 ; Transcript Order: Filer: Santander Barros-Pulido, Court Reporter: Tana J. Hess, Proceeding Type and Date: Plea Hearing 12/12/2024. [Entered: 08/15/2025 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Bryant Ashley Scriven for Appellant Santander Barros-Pulido. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-12402] (ECF: Bryant Scriven) [Entered: 08/14/2025 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Bryant Ashley Scriven for Appellant Santander Barros-Pulido. Transcript(s) ordered. [25-12402] (ECF: Bryant Scriven) [Entered: 08/14/2025 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Julia Kapusta for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-12402] (ECF: Julia Kapusta) [Entered: 08/07/2025 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Santander Barros-Pulido. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files in the District Court a completed Transcript Order Form OR a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered. [Entered: 08/07/2025 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Bryant Ashley Scriven for Santander Barros-Pulido. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website and have not filed the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). [Entered: 08/07/2025 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 USDC order Denying appointment of counsel as to Appellant Santander Barros-Pulido was filed on 07/17/2025. Docket Entry 271. [Entered: 08/07/2025 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Julia R. Kapusta for United States of America U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida for USA. Related cases? No. [25-12402] (ECF: Julia Kapusta) [Entered: 07/30/2025 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 2 CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney Bryant Ashley Scriven for Appellant Santander Barros-Pulido. [Entered: 07/16/2025 08:16 PM] |
| Filing 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Santander Barros-Pulido on 07/14/2025. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appoint Counsel for appeal filed on 07/14/2025. [Entered: 07/16/2025 08:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
