Michael Conklin v. Jerry Leonard, et al
| MICHAEL CONKLIN |
| JERRY LEONARD, CODY ROSE, ADRIAN FREDERICKS, JOHN/JANE DOE OFFICERS, R.J. KOCH, JOHN/JANE DOE SUPERVISORS, CLAY WHITTLE and COLUMBIA COUNTY |
| 25-13031 |
| September 3, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 10/24/2025 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 12 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Michael Conklin. The appellant's brief is due on or before 12/02/2025. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 10/23/2025 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 11 USDC FRAP 4 Order as to Appellant Michael Conklin was filed on 10/20/2025. Docket Entry 92. [Entered: 10/23/2025 08:54 AM] |
| Filing 10 Jurisdiction: FRAP 4 motion pending in district court as to Appellant Michael Conklin DE #: 84 [Entered: 09/22/2025 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 9 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Michael Conklin. The appellant's brief is due on or before 10/14/2025. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 09/18/2025 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Attorney John Paul Batson for Appellant Michael Conklin. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 09/18/2025 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 7 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney John Paul Batson for Appellant Michael Conklin. Related cases? No. [25-13031] (ECF: John Batson) [Entered: 09/18/2025 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney John Paul Batson for Appellant Michael Conklin. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-13031] (ECF: John Batson) [Entered: 09/18/2025 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 5 Notice of deficient Certificate of Interested Persons and Civil Appeal Statement filed by John Paul Batson for Michael Conklin. Incorrect Event used to file a document [Entered: 09/18/2025 08:37 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by John Paul Batson for Michael Conklin. Related cases? No. [25-13031] (ECF: John Batson) [Entered: 09/17/2025 11:26 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney James B. Ellington for Appellees Columbia County, Adrian Fredericks, R.J. Koch, Jerry Leonard, Cody Rose and Clay Whittle. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-13031] (ECF: James Ellington) [Entered: 09/17/2025 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by James B. Ellington for Columbia County, Adrian Fredericks, R.J. Koch, Jerry Leonard, Cody Rose and Clay Whittle. Related cases? No. [25-13031] (ECF: James Ellington) [Entered: 09/05/2025 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael Conklin on 09/02/2025. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 09/22/2025 as to Appellant Michael Conklin. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/02/2025 as to Appellee Jerry Leonard. [Entered: 09/04/2025 10:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.