Darrell Cross v. Woodward, et al
| DARRELL D. CROSS |
| WOODWARD, STYLLE, STEWART, EADWARD LOWE, WARDEN, ALISA EVANS, JONATHAN SWAINFORD, CHRISTOPER MCCALISTER, ELAM, STOKES, EADWARD, ALL ACTIVE COMMUNITY DETAIL INMATE LABOR WORKERS, TAYLOR and TIMOTHY TURNER |
| 25-13128 |
| September 8, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal [ # 3 ] filed by Appellant Darrell D. Cross. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): On 9/30/2025, this appeal was DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Darrell D. Cross has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules. Additionally, the filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1. [Entered: 10/08/2025 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant Darrell D. Cross. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [3] [Entered: 10/08/2025 10:04 AM] |
Filing 2
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Darrell D. Cross has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 09/30/2025 11:08 AM]
|
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Darrell D. Cross on 09/08/2025. Fee Status: Three Strikes. [Entered: 09/11/2025 03:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
