Fernando Gonzalez-Romero v. Sheriff, Hillsborough County Florida, et al
| FERNANDO GONZALEZ-ROMERO |
| SHERIFF, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA, SUSAN LOPEZ, State Attorney and THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT |
| 25-13142 |
| September 10, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Fernando Gonzalez-Romero failed to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules. [Entered: 10/31/2025 08:05 AM]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Fernando Gonzalez-Romero. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). [Entered: 10/07/2025 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees Assessed. Filed on 09/12/2025. Docket Entry 7. [Entered: 09/26/2025 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Fernando Gonzalez-Romero on 09/08/2025. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 09/11/2025 08:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
