Karen Price v. David Widaski, Sr., et al
Plaintiff: KAREN PRICE
Defendant: DAVID WIDASKI, SR., LOUIS LEVENSON, MICHAEL COHEN, DEBBIE-ANN RICKMAN, THOMAS A. COX, JR., TODD ASHLEY, RACHEL R. KRAUSE, FULTON COUNTY MARSHA JANE DOE 1, FULTON COUNTY MARSHA JOHN DOE 1 and FIRST SERVICE RESIDENTIAL
Case Number: 25-13226
Filed: September 16, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Karen Price failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 12/23/2025 09:38 AM]
December 9, 2025 Filing 11 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Karen Price. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files in the District Court a completed Transcript Order Form OR a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered. [Entered: 12/09/2025 03:48 PM]
December 9, 2025 Filing 10 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Karen Price. You have failed to file the CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 12/09/2025 03:41 PM]
November 19, 2025 Filing 9 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Karen Price was filed on 11/18/2025. Docket Entry 66. [Entered: 11/19/2025 11:13 AM]
November 19, 2025 Filing 8 USDC FRAP 4 Order as to Appellant Karen Price was filed on 11/18/2025. Docket Entry 66. [Entered: 11/19/2025 11:12 AM]
October 27, 2025 Filing 7 Returned Mail was received for Party Karen Price. IN RE: 10/27/2025 CIP Deficiency Letter [Entered: 10/30/2025 08:53 AM]
October 14, 2025 Filing 6 Jurisdiction: FRAP 4 motion pending in district court as to Appellant Karen Price DE #: 27 [Entered: 10/14/2025 10:04 AM]
October 7, 2025 Filing 5 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Karen Price. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files in the District Court a completed Transcript Order Form OR a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered. [Entered: 10/07/2025 09:11 AM]
October 7, 2025 Filing 4 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Karen Price. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). [Entered: 10/07/2025 09:08 AM]
September 29, 2025 Filing 3 Returned Mail was received for Party Karen Price. IN RE: 9/29/2025 Civil - Notice of Docketing [Entered: 10/03/2025 11:52 AM]
September 18, 2025 Filing 2 NOTICE TO PARTIES: Due to the large number of parties associated with this appeal, not all parties from the district court docket have been entered on this Court's docket at this time. The parties may consult the relevant notice(s) of appeal, other case documents, and the district court docket to identify all parties. If any party objects to not having all parties listed on the docket, the party may file an objection stating its reasoning within 14 days after the date of this notice. [Entered: 09/18/2025 11:27 AM]
September 16, 2025 Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Karen Price on 09/16/2025. Fee Status: IFP Granted. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/06/2025 as to Appellant Karen Price. [Entered: 09/18/2025 11:23 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Karen Price v. David Widaski, Sr., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KAREN PRICE
Represented By: Karen Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID WIDASKI, SR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LOUIS LEVENSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL COHEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEBBIE-ANN RICKMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THOMAS A. COX, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TODD ASHLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RACHEL R. KRAUSE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FULTON COUNTY MARSHA JANE DOE 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FULTON COUNTY MARSHA JOHN DOE 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FIRST SERVICE RESIDENTIAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?