Kenneth Bailey v. Shawn Swindell
| KENNETH BAILEY |
| SHAWN T. SWINDELL |
| SERVICE |
| 25-13448 |
| October 3, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 Received paper copies of Appellee brief [2 copies ] and appendix, [2 copies] [2 volumes] for Appellee Kenneth Bailey. [Entered: 03/27/2026 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 24 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by J. Phillip Warren for Kenneth Bailey. Related cases? No. [25-13448] (ECF: J. Warren) [Entered: 03/25/2026 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 23 NOTICE TO PARTIES: Within seven days of the date of this notice, each party must send to the Court paper copies of the party's brief(s) and appendix, if any, as specified in the attached notice. [Entered: 03/25/2026 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 21 Reply Brief filed by Appellant Shawn T. Swindell. [25-13448] (ECF: Matthew Kozyra) [Entered: 03/19/2026 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 20 Corrected Supplemental Appendix [2 VOLUMES] filed by Appellee Kenneth Bailey. [25-13448] (ECF: Keith Weidner) [Entered: 03/10/2026 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 19 Notice of deficient Supplemental Appellee appendix filed by Attorney Keith William Weidner for Appellee Kenneth Bailey. Deficiencies: Volume I and Volume II must be separately attached in the docket entry. [Entered: 03/09/2026 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 18 DEFICIENT *** Supplemental Appendix [2 VOLUMES] filed by Appellee Kenneth Bailey. [25-13448]--[Edited 03/09/2026 by CRL] (ECF: Keith Weidner) [Entered: 03/04/2026 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 17 Appellee's Brief filed by Appellee Kenneth Bailey. [25-13448] (ECF: Keith Weidner) [Entered: 02/27/2026 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 16 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Keith William Weidner for Appellee Kenneth Bailey. Appellee's Brief due on 02/27/2026 as to Appellee Kenneth Bailey.. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 01/14/2026 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 15 Appendix filed [3 VOLUMES] by Appellant Shawn T. Swindell. [25-13448] (ECF: Matthew Kozyra) [Entered: 01/05/2026 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 14 Appellant's brief filed by Shawn T. Swindell. [25-13448] (ECF: Matthew Kozyra) [Entered: 12/29/2025 05:43 PM] |
| Filing 13 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Matthew Kozyra for Appellant Shawn T. Swindell. Appellant's brief due on 12/29/2025 as to Appellant Shawn T. Swindell. Appendix due on 01/05/2026 as to Appellant Shawn T. Swindell. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 11/05/2025 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 12 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 10/28/2025 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Keith William Weidner for Appellee Kenneth Bailey. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-13448] (ECF: Keith Weidner) [Entered: 10/21/2025 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 10 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Shawn T. Swindell. The appellant's brief is due on or before 11/26/2025. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 10/17/2025 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Attorney Matthew Kozyra for Appellant Shawn T. Swindell. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 10/17/2025 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Matthew Kozyra for Appellant Shawn T. Swindell. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [25-13448] (ECF: Matthew Kozyra) [Entered: 10/17/2025 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 7 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Matthew Kozyra for Appellant Shawn T. Swindell. Related cases? No. [25-13448] (ECF: Matthew Kozyra) [Entered: 10/17/2025 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Matthew Kozyra for Appellant Shawn T. Swindell. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-13448] (ECF: Matthew Kozyra) [Entered: 10/17/2025 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Matthew Kozyra for Shawn T. Swindell. Related cases? No. [25-13448] (ECF: Matthew Kozyra) [Entered: 10/17/2025 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Thomas W. Poulton for Shawn T. Swindell. Related cases? No. [25-13448] (ECF: Thomas Poulton) [Entered: 10/17/2025 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Keith William Weidner for Kenneth Bailey. Related cases? No. [25-13448] (ECF: Keith Weidner) [Entered: 10/06/2025 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 2 Removed from case: Attorney Keith William Weidner for Appellant Shawn T. Swindell in 25-13448. [Entered: 10/03/2025 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Shawn T. Swindell on 10/02/2025. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/21/2025 as to Appellant Shawn T. Swindell. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/31/2025 as to Appellee Kenneth Bailey. [Entered: 10/03/2025 01:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
