Thomas Pepe v. Saul Villalobos, et al
Plaintiff: THOMAS PEPE
Defendant: SAUL B. VILLALOBOS, KHALEEB HOOVER, STEVEN PEPE, LUKE LAJGI, CHRIS DECOSTA, STEPHEN C. RUBINO and KIM HUBERT
Case Number: 25-13560
Filed: October 10, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 8, 2026 Thomas Pepe v. Saul B. Villalobos, et al

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2026 Filing 23 NOTICE TO PARTIES: Within seven days of the date of this notice, each party must send to the Court paper copies of the party's brief(s) and appendix, if any, as specified in the attached notice. [Entered: 02/12/2026 02:43 PM]
February 12, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER: Appeal reinstated by the clerk as to Appellant Thomas Pepe because the appeal was erroneously dismissed on 01/28/2026. Subsitute NOA filed in USDC (DE 42). [Entered: 02/12/2026 12:52 PM]
January 28, 2026 Filing 20 MOTION MOOT: Motion for recusal is MOOT [ # 12 ] due to clerk's order filed 01/28/2026. Motion filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe. [Entered: 01/28/2026 12:13 PM]
January 28, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Thomas Pepe failed to comply with the order of this court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 01/28/2026 12:03 PM]
January 23, 2026 Filing 18 Notice that no action will be taken on Amended Notice of Appeal filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing appears intended for another court.. [Entered: 01/23/2026 04:40 PM]
January 20, 2026 Filing 17 Amended Notice of Appeal filed by Party Thomas Pepe. [Entered: 01/23/2026 04:37 PM]
January 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: Appellant Thomas Pepe Appellant is DIRECTED to file a substitute, signed notice of appeal in the district court within fourteen days. Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b). The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide a copy of this Order to the district court. The district court shall transmit to this Court any signed notice of appeal filed in compliance with this Order. KCN (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 01/06/2026 03:23 PM]
November 13, 2025 Filing 14 Corrected Appendix filed [1 volumes - 1 copies] by Party Thomas Pepe. [Entered: 11/20/2025 04:30 PM]
November 10, 2025 Filing 15 Notice of receipt: request for a status update as to Appellant Thomas Pepe.. [Entered: 11/24/2025 12:43 PM]
November 10, 2025 Filing 13 Corrected Appellant brief filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe. [Entered: 11/20/2025 04:27 PM]
November 10, 2025 Filing 12 MOTION for recusal filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [12] [Entered: 11/20/2025 10:55 AM]
November 10, 2025 Filing 11 Notice of receipt: Clarification of Brief Versions and Scope of Appeal as to Appellant Thomas Pepe.. [Entered: 11/20/2025 10:53 AM]
November 5, 2025 Filing 10 Notice of deficient Appellant appendix filed by Party Thomas Pepe. Deficiencies: Does not contain all required docs from USDC record. See 11th Cir. R. 30(a)(1). [Entered: 11/05/2025 02:57 PM]
November 5, 2025 Filing 9 Notice of deficient Appellant brief filed by Party Thomas Pepe.Deficiencies: Brief and Appendix are not seperate documents. [Entered: 11/05/2025 02:44 PM]
November 3, 2025 Filing 6 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion [ # 5 ] filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1.. [Entered: 11/03/2025 11:25 AM]
October 31, 2025 Filing 8 Appellant's brief and appendix filed by Thomas Pepe. [Entered: 11/05/2025 02:31 PM]
October 31, 2025 Filing 7 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe. [Entered: 11/05/2025 11:04 AM]
October 29, 2025 Filing 5 MOTION to designate master filing USCA and declaration in support of master filing filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [5] [Entered: 11/03/2025 11:23 AM]
October 29, 2025 Filing 4 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 3 ] filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): IFP has been granted by District Court. [Entered: 10/29/2025 02:46 PM]
October 24, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [3] [Entered: 10/29/2025 02:44 PM]
October 14, 2025 Filing 2 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Thomas Pepe. The appellant's brief is due on or before 11/19/2025. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 10/14/2025 11:40 AM]
October 10, 2025 Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe on 10/10/2025. Fee Status: IFP Granted. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/03/2025 as to Appellant Thomas Pepe. [Entered: 10/14/2025 11:35 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Thomas Pepe v. Saul Villalobos, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS PEPE
Represented By: Thomas Pepe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAUL B. VILLALOBOS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KHALEEB HOOVER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEVEN PEPE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LUKE LAJGI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRIS DECOSTA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEPHEN C. RUBINO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KIM HUBERT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?