Michael Arrington v. Miami Dade County Public School District, et al
| MICHAEL DEWAYNE ARRINGTON |
| MIAMI DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT, SUPERINTENDENT AND/OR DIRECTOR OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT, PRINCIPAL OF GEORGE T. BAKER AVIATION SCHOOL, SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERVISOR, GEORGE T. BAKER AVIATION SCHOOL, CLAUDIA MCEVOY, IDA SIGILLO, ALBERTO FLORES, GEORGE T. BAKER AVIATION SCHOOL, ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL, GEORGE T. BAKER AVIATION SCHOOL, George W. Sands, individually and in his official capacity and ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL, GEORGE T. BAKER AVIATION SCHOOL, Robert Morales, individually and in his official capacity |
| 25-13636 |
| October 15, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Education |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Received paper copies of Appellant brief [2 copies ] and appendix, [1 copy] [3 volumes] for Appellant Michael Dewayne Arrington. [Entered: 03/02/2026 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 16 Received paper copies of Appellees brief [2 copies ] for Appellees Miami Dade County Public School District and Superintendent and/or Director of Miami-Dade County Public Schools District. [Entered: 02/24/2026 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO PARTIES: Within seven days of the date of this notice, each party must send to the Court paper copies of the party's brief(s) and appendix, if any, as specified in the attached notice. [Entered: 02/19/2026 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 14 Appellee's Brief filed by Appellees Miami Dade County Public School District and Superintendent and/or Director of Miami-Dade County Public Schools District. [25-13636] (ECF: Luis Garcia) [Entered: 01/20/2026 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 13 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Luis Michael Garcia for Appellees Miami Dade County Public School District and Superintendent and/or Director of Miami-Dade County Public Schools District. Appellee's Brief due on 01/20/2026 as to Appellee Miami Dade County Public School District.. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 12/16/2025 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 12 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-13636] (ECF: Luis Garcia) [Entered: 12/15/2025 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Luis Michael Garcia for Miami Dade County Public School District and Superintendent and/or Director of Miami-Dade County Public Schools District. Related cases? No. [25-13636] (ECF: Luis Garcia) [Entered: 12/15/2025 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 10 Appendix filed [3 VOLUMES] by Appellant Michael Dewayne Arrington. [25-13636] (ECF: Michael Arrington) [Entered: 11/22/2025 06:25 AM] |
| Filing 9 Appellant's brief filed by Michael Dewayne Arrington. [25-13636] (ECF: Michael Arrington) [Entered: 11/19/2025 05:06 AM] |
| Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party Michael Dewayne Arrington. No hearings. [Entered: 11/06/2025 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Party Michael Dewayne Arrington. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-13636] (ECF: Michael Arrington) [Entered: 11/06/2025 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM SUBMITTED by Party Michael Dewayne Arrington. No hearings. [25-13636] (ECF: Michael Arrington) [Entered: 11/06/2025 08:55 AM] |
| Filing 5 **ENTERED IN ERROR**Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-13636] (ECF: Michael Arrington) [Entered: 11/06/2025 08:50 AM] |
| Filing 4 USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Michael Dewayne Arrington was filed on 03/23/2016. Docket Entry 10. [Entered: 10/21/2025 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 3 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Michael Dewayne Arrington. The appellant's brief is due on or before 11/24/2025. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 10/21/2025 09:09 AM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO PARTIES: Due to the large number of parties associated with this appeal, not all parties from the district court docket have been entered on this Court's docket at this time. The parties may consult the relevant notice(s) of appeal, other case documents, and the district court docket to identify all parties. If any party objects to not having all parties listed on the docket, the party may file an objection stating its reasoning within 14 days after the date of this notice. [Entered: 10/21/2025 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael Dewayne Arrington on 10/14/2025. Fee Status: IFP Granted. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/10/2025 as to Appellant Michael Dewayne Arrington. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/18/2025 as to Appellee Miami Dade County Public School District. [Entered: 10/21/2025 09:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
