In re: Eugene Marlin
| In re: EUGENE MARLIN |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA |
| 25-13686 |
| October 20, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER: Motion for leave to file successive petition for habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Eugene Marlin is DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part. [ # 1 ] ALB, FMH and CRW (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 10/29/2025 01:15 PM]
|
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. EMERGENCY Application for leave to file successive petition for habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Eugene Marlin. Fee Status: Fee Not Required [Entered: 10/21/2025 03:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Eugene Marlin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: EUGENE MARLIN | |
| Represented By: | Eugene Marlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Michael Carr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
