Daniel Demery v. PMP Asset, LLC
| DANIEL DEMERY |
| PMP ASSET, LLC |
| 25-13824 |
| October 31, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Daniel Demery failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 03/19/2026 09:33 AM]
|
| Filing 9 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Daniel Demery was filed on 01/20/2026. Docket Entry 25. [Entered: 02/12/2026 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 8 USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Daniel Demery was filed on 12/10/2025. Docket Entry 21. [Entered: 01/02/2026 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 7 USDC order directing appellant to file IFP form or Statement of Prison Account as to Appellant Daniel Demery was filed on 11/24/2025. Docket Entry 18. [Entered: 01/02/2026 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 6 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to reinstate appeal [ # 4 ], Motion for extension to file appellant brief [ # 4 ], Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 4 ] filed by Appellant Daniel Demery. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The motions are not necessary as the case has been clerically reinstated, the briefing schedule has not been issued and a motion for IFP is pending before the United States District Court. [Entered: 01/02/2026 01:08 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER: Appeal reinstated by the clerk as to Appellant Daniel Demery because the appeal was erroneously dismissed on 01/02/2026. The filing(s) referenced in the entry of dismissal were timely filed. [Entered: 01/02/2026 01:06 PM]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to reinstate appeal, for extension of time to file appellants brief, to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Daniel Demery. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [4] [Entered: 01/02/2026 10:05 AM] |
Filing 3
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Daniel Demery failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 11/25/2025 10:44 AM]
|
| Filing 2 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Daniel Demery. [Entered: 11/12/2025 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Daniel Demery on 10/31/2025. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis DE 2 filed on 10/14/2025. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/21/2025 as to Appellant Daniel Demery. [Entered: 11/03/2025 10:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Daniel Demery v. PMP Asset, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DANIEL DEMERY | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Demery |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PMP ASSET, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.