Lee Scott v. Michael Satz, et al
| LEE R SCOTT |
| MICHAEL SATZ, Head Prosecutor, STATE ATTORNEYS OFFICE, THE INSURANCE COMPANY FOR THE STATE ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES, ALL OTHER STATE ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES, MERRIGAN, Brroward County Court Judge, PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, JAMES TYLOCK and LEROY H. MOE, Judge |
| 25-14123 |
| November 20, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Notice of receipt: Letter: I did not file an appeal to your court. as to Appellant Lee R Scott.. [Entered: 03/11/2026 02:31 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Lee R Scott failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 02/06/2026 11:54 AM]
|
| Filing 9 Returned Mail was received for Party Lee R Scott. IN RE: 12/23/25 FRAP 4 Tolling Motion [Entered: 01/26/2026 08:33 AM] |
| Filing 8 This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion for relief from the obligation to pay in advance is filed in the District Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 01/15/2026 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 7 USDC FRAP 4 Order as to Appellant Lee R Scott was filed on 01/14/2026. Docket Entry 17. [Entered: 01/15/2026 01:14 PM] |
| Filing 6 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for leave to proceed [ # 4 ] filed by Appellant Lee R Scott. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing appears intended for another court.. [Entered: 01/14/2026 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 5 Jurisdiction: FRAP 4 motion pending in district court as to Appellant Lee R Scott DE #: DE 8 [Entered: 12/23/2025 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION for leave to proceed filed by Appellant Lee R Scott. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [4] [Entered: 12/19/2025 09:56 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appeal reinstated by the clerk as to Appellant Lee R Scott because the appeal was dismissed in error on 12/17/2025. The filing(s) referenced in the entry of dismissal were timely filed pursuant to FRAP 25(a)(2)(A)(iii). [Entered: 12/19/2025 09:37 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Lee R Scott failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 12/17/2025 11:17 AM]
|
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Lee R Scott on 11/20/2025. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 11/25/2025 02:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
