In re: Shakka James
| In re: SHAKKA SHANEAK JAMES |
| ELEANOR L. ROSS, J. ELIZABETH MCBATH, ZIP DELIVERY, LLC, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR |
| 25-14257 |
| December 4, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: Accordingly, Jamess mandamus petition is hereby DISMISSED as moot [ # 1 ]; and her motion to proceed IFP is DENIED as moot. [ # 5 ] RSR, KCN and BL (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 03/31/2026 09:10 AM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Petitioner Shakka Shaneak James. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [5] [Entered: 01/06/2026 02:18 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Motion to reinstate appeal filed by Petitioner Shakka Shaneak James is GRANTED by clerk [ # 3 ]. [Entered: 01/05/2026 04:37 PM]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to reinstate petition for writ of mandamus and to proceed IFP filed by Petitioner Shakka Shaneak James. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [3] [25-14257] (ECF: Shakka James) [Entered: 12/30/2025 02:46 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this petition is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Petitioner Shakka Shaneak James failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the clerk of this court or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within the time fixed by the rules; Petition for writ of mandamus is MOOT [ # 1 ] [Entered: 12/29/2025 02:19 PM]
|
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. Petition for WRIT of MANDAMUS filed by Petitioner Shakka Shaneak James. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid [Entered: 12/05/2025 10:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
