Michael Hernandez v. Sheriff of Levy County, Florida, et al
| MICHAEL HERNANDEZ |
| SHERIFF OF LEVY COUNTY, FLORIDA, STATE ATTORNEY OF LEVY COUNTY, FLORIDA, JUDGE, Levy County Court of Florida, CHRISTOPHER J. PERRYMAN, Detective Corporal, SURENDRA NARAYAN, Lieutenant, GERALD WILLIAMS, Officer, SCOTT STANCIL, Detective, BLAKE MURPHY, Officer, ARIELLE SCREWS, Assistant State Attorney and GLEN BRYANT, Assistant State Attorney of Levy County Florida |
| 25-14407 |
| December 18, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Notice of receipt: Notice to Clerk of Court as to Appellant Michael Hernandez.. [Entered: 03/13/2026 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION for leave to proceed filed by Appellant Michael Hernandez. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [16] [Entered: 03/13/2026 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 15 USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees Assessed. Filed on 12/19/2025. Docket Entry 42. [Entered: 02/25/2026 02:32 PM] |
Filing 13
ORDER: Motion to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Michael Hernandez is GRANTED by clerk [ # 11 ]. [Entered: 02/25/2026 02:08 PM]
|
| Filing 12 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Michael Hernandez. [Entered: 02/24/2026 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Michael Hernandez. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [11] [Entered: 02/24/2026 01:29 PM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Michael Hernandez failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 02/05/2026 01:45 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Appendix -A filed [1 VOLUMES - 1 copies] by Party Michael Hernandez. [Entered: 02/05/2026 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 8 Appellant's brief filed by Michael Hernandez. [Entered: 01/29/2026 05:39 PM] |
| Filing 7 Appendix filed [4 VOLUMES - 1 copies] by Party Michael Hernandez. [Entered: 01/21/2026 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Michael Hernandez. You have failed to file the CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 01/13/2026 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party Michael Hernandez. No hearings. [Entered: 01/13/2026 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 4 Notice of receipt: Notice to the Clerk of Court as to Appellant Michael Hernandez.. [Entered: 01/13/2026 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees Assessed. Filed on 12/19/2025. Docket Entry 42. [Entered: 12/23/2025 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC Motion filed by appellant for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees or consent form. Filed on 12/16/2025. Docket Entry 39. [Entered: 12/19/2025 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael Hernandez on 12/16/2025. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. USDC motion Pending: MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed on 12/16/2025. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 12/19/2025 11:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
