Amanda Kuiper v. State of Georgia, et al
| AMANDA NICOLE KUIPER |
| STATE OF GEORGIA, WILLIAM A. FEARS, JOHN E. OTT, THOMAS WILSON, JONATHAN KUIPER, EUNICE KUIPER, ADAM NAGEL, PASLEY NUCE, & MALORY, LLC, STEPHEN L. COXEN and THE COXEN FIRM, LLC |
| 25-14432 |
| December 22, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Amanda Nicole Kuiper has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 06/09/2026 09:37 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Amanda Nicole Kuiper is DENIED. [ # 7 ] EJK (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 05/19/2026 10:28 AM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Amanda Nicole Kuiper. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [25-14432] (ECF: Amanda Kuiper) [Entered: 02/02/2026 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 6 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Amanda Nicole Kuiper was filed on 01/21/2026. Docket Entry 37. [Entered: 01/21/2026 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Andria Naomi Allen for Adam Nagel and Pasley Nuce, & Malory, LLC. You have failed to file the CIP and failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 01/21/2026 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Party Amanda Nicole Kuiper. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-14432] (ECF: Amanda Kuiper) [Entered: 01/17/2026 09:50 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Amanda Nicole Kuiper. You have failed to file the CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 01/12/2026 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO PARTIES: Due to the large number of parties associated with this appeal, not all parties from the district court docket have been entered on this Court's docket at this time. The parties may consult the relevant notice(s) of appeal, other case documents, and the district court docket to identify all parties. If any party objects to not having all parties listed on the docket, the party may file an objection stating its reasoning within 14 days after the date of this notice. [Entered: 12/22/2025 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Amanda Nicole Kuiper on 12/19/2025. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis DE 34 filed on 12/19/2025. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 12/22/2025 11:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
