Steven Savage v. Cary Way, et al
| STEVEN RAY SAVAGE |
| CARY L. WAY, JERALD F. WATSON, DANIELE MORTHLAND, D'BORIS SMITH, BANKS COUNTY SHERIFF, JEREMY GRINDLE, J. N. MANLEY, HALL COUNTY SHERIFF, JOHN DOE NO. 1, 2, 3, AND 4 and JANE DOE NO. 1, 2, 3, AND 4 |
| 25-14444 |
| December 19, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER: The motion to reinstate filed by the Appellant is hereby GRANTED. The parties have 14 days after the date of this order to file a notice with the Clerk specifying which motions mooted by the dismissal of this appeal, if any, are to be renewed. The time for filing a response to any renewed motion runs from the date the opposing partys notice is docketed. Parties seeking to renew a motion after the 14-day renewal period expires will be required to refile the motion. [ # 18 ] JP and BCG [Entered: 06/03/2026 10:52 AM]
|
| Filing 17 Appendix filed [1 VOLUME] by Appellant Steven Ray Savage. [25-14444]--[Edited 06/03/2026 by JC] (ECF: Brandon Waller) [Entered: 05/04/2026 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 19 Notice to Appellant's Counsel: An appendix has been filed. The appeal remains closed. A motion to reinstate the appeal must be filed before the Court will consider reinstating the appeal. [Entered: 05/04/2026 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 18 MOTION to set aside dismissal filed by Steven Ray Savage. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [18] [25-14444]--[Edited 05/04/2026 by JC] (ECF: Brandon Waller) [Entered: 05/04/2026 03:04 PM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-2(c), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Steven Ray Savage failed to file an appendix within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 05/04/2026 08:04 AM]
|
| Filing 15 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Brandon Dean Waller for Steven Ray Savage. Related cases? No. [25-14444] (ECF: Brandon Waller) [Entered: 04/28/2026 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 14 The appellant brief filed by Attorney Brandon Dean Waller for Appellant Steven Ray Savage has been conditionally filed. An appearance of counsel form must be filed within 14 days from this date. [Entered: 04/27/2026 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 13 Appellant's brief filed by Steven Ray Savage. [25-14444] (ECF: Brandon Waller) [Entered: 04/24/2026 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 12 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Russell A. Britt for Appellees Banks County Sheriff, Daniele Morthland, D'Boris Smith, Jerald F. Watson and Cary L. Way. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-14444] (ECF: Russell Britt) [Entered: 01/21/2026 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Russell A. Britt and Stuart Fallin Sumner for appellees. You have failed to file the CIP and failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. Please remedy the defaults within 7 days from this date. [Entered: 01/21/2026 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 10 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 01/13/2026 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Cary L. Way Stuart Fallin Sumner for Banks County Sheriff, Daniele Morthland, D'Boris Smith, Jerald F. Watson and Cary L. Way. Related cases? No. [25-14444] (ECF: Stuart Sumner) [Entered: 01/09/2026 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Russell A. Britt for Banks County Sheriff, Daniele Morthland, D'Boris Smith, Jerald F. Watson and Cary L. Way. Related cases? No. [25-14444] (ECF: Russell Britt) [Entered: 01/09/2026 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 7 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Steven Ray Savage. The appellant's brief is due on or before 01/28/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 01/06/2026 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Service filed by Attorney John Richard Neville for Appellant Steven Ray Savage. [25-14444] (ECF: John Neville) [Entered: 01/06/2026 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 5 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney John Richard Neville for Appellant Steven Ray Savage. Related cases? Yes. [25-14444] (ECF: John Neville) [Entered: 01/06/2026 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by John Richard Neville for Steven Ray Savage. Related cases? Yes. [25-14444] (ECF: John Neville) [Entered: 01/06/2026 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 3 Notice of E-filing Deficiency to counsel John Richard Neville for Steven Ray Savage. The required Apperance of Counsel Form has not been filed. Please file an Apperanace of Counsel Form within the next 3 business days. [Entered: 01/06/2026 12:20 PM] |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Richard Neville for Steven Savage Attorney John Richard Neville for Appellant Steven Ray Savage. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-14444] (ECF: John Neville) [Entered: 01/05/2026 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Steven Ray Savage on 12/18/2025. Fee Status: Fee Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 12/23/2025 11:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
