Roy Latimore v. Latrevious Hall, et al
| ROY LATIMORE |
| LATREVIOUS HALL, JERMAIN WHITE, VERONICA STEWART, SYDNEY PILINKO, ATRIUM HEALTH NAVICENT HOSPITAL, RICKY WILCOX, JIMMIE KELLOM, TONJI KEITH, CRYSTAL MAYNOR and GRAVES |
| 25-14488 |
| December 24, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Roy Latimore has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 01/21/2026 03:11 PM]
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO PARTIES: Due to the large number of parties associated with this appeal, not all parties from the district court docket have been entered on this Court's docket at this time. The parties may consult the relevant notice(s) of appeal, other case documents, and the district court docket to identify all parties. If any party objects to not having all parties listed on the docket, the party may file an objection stating its reasoning within 14 days after the date of this notice. [Entered: 12/30/2025 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Roy Latimore on 12/24/2025. Fee Status: Three Strikes. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 12/30/2025 02:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
