Nameros Ford v. Mayor, City of Birmingham, et al
| NAMEROS D. FORD |
| RANDALL WOODFIN, OFFICER JEFFERSON, BIRMINGHAM CITY JAIL, BIRMINGHAM CROSSPLEX TRANSIT CENTER, JUDGE JAVAN PATTON CRAYTON and MAYOR, CITY OF BIRMINGHAM |
| 25-14548 |
| December 31, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Nameros D. Ford. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 05/20/2026 12:50 PM] |
| Filing 5 This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in this Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 05/05/2026 09:44 AM] |
| Filing 4 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Nameros D. Ford was filed on 03/30/2026. Docket Entry 38. [Entered: 03/31/2026 08:32 AM] |
| Filing 3 Notice of receipt: Pay stub and print receipt as to Appellant Nameros D. Ford.. [Entered: 01/09/2026 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Nameros D. Ford. [Entered: 01/09/2026 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Nameros D. Ford on 12/31/2025. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. USDC motion pending: MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis DE 31 filed on 12/31/2025. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 01/02/2026 11:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
