Susan Drazen, et al v. GoDaddy Inc., et al
| SUSAN DRAZEN and JASON W. BENNETT |
| GODADDY INC. and JUAN ENRIQUE PINTO |
| 25-90008 |
| April 21, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER: Petition for permission to appeal pursuant to 1292(b) filed by Petitioner Susan Drazen is GRANTED. [ # 1 ] General Case Number 25-13409-E has been assigned to this case. KCN, ELB and BL (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 09/30/2025 02:50 PM]
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER: Petitioner Susan Drazens motion for leave to file a reply in support of the petition is GRANTED [ # 12 ]; Respondent GoDaddy.com, LLCs motion to amend the caption is GRANTED [ # 13 ]; The Clerks Office is directed to amend the caption to remove Jason W. Bennett as a petitioner. EJK (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 07/01/2025 11:24 AM]
|
| Filing 17 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Robert William Clore for Respondent Juan Enrique Pinto. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-90008] (ECF: Robert Clore) [Entered: 06/09/2025 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 16 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Jeffrey M. Monhait for Respondent GDDY. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-90008] (ECF: Jeffrey Monhait) [Entered: 05/27/2025 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Robert William Clore for Juan Enrique Pinto and Jeffrey M. Monhait for GDDY. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). [Entered: 05/27/2025 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion filed by Respondent GDDY [ # 13 ] filed by Attorney Derek Reinbold for Petitioners Jason W. Bennett and Susan Drazen. [25-90008] (ECF: Derek Reinbold) [Entered: 05/22/2025 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion [ # 12 ] with incorporated MOTION to amend the style of this appeal filed by Respondent GDDY. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [13] [25-90008] (ECF: Jeffrey Monhait) [Entered: 05/12/2025 05:24 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION to file a supplement brief filed by Susan Drazen. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [12] [25-90008] (ECF: Derek Reinbold) [Entered: 05/12/2025 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Robert William Clore for Juan Enrique Pinto. Related cases? No. [25-90008] (ECF: Robert Clore) [Entered: 05/06/2025 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Robert William Clore for Juan Enrique Pinto. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(b) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). [Entered: 05/06/2025 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 9 Notice of deficient Appearance of Counsel filed by Robert William Clore for Juan Enrique Pinto. The required Appearance of Counsel Form has not been received. Please file an Appearance of Counsel Form. [Entered: 05/06/2025 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Petition filed by Petitioners Jason W. Bennett and Susan Drazen [ # 1 ] filed by Attorney Robert William Clore for Respondent Juan Enrique Pinto. [25-90008] (ECF: Robert Clore) [Entered: 05/05/2025 08:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Petition filed by Petitioners Jason W. Bennett and Susan Drazen [ # 1 ] filed by Attorney Jeffrey M. Monhait for Respondent GDDY. [25-90008] (ECF: Jeffrey Monhait) [Entered: 05/05/2025 06:52 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Derek Reinbold for Susan Drazen, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [25-90008] (ECF: Derek Reinbold) [Entered: 05/02/2025 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Derek Reinbold for Susan Drazen, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated Related cases? Yes. [25-90008] (ECF: Derek Reinbold) [Entered: 05/02/2025 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Robert Stephen Clark for GDDY. Related cases? No. [25-90008] (ECF: Robert Clark) [Entered: 04/24/2025 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jeffrey M. Monhait for GDDY. Related cases? No. [25-90008] (ECF: Jeffrey Monhait) [Entered: 04/24/2025 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Derek Reinbold for Jason W. Bennett and Susan Drazen. Related cases? Yes. [25-90008] (ECF: Derek Reinbold) [Entered: 04/24/2025 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 MISCELLANEOUS CASE DOCKETED. Petition for permission to appeal pursuant to 1292(b) filed by Petitioners Jason W. Bennett and Susan Drazen. [Entered: 04/24/2025 11:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
