Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Steven Thomason, et al
| DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO. |
| STEVEN CLAYTON THOMASON |
| BRE LEONNA THOMASON and NORCISSE PRISCA THOMASON |
| 26-10057 |
| January 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Foreclosure |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 50 Appellant's brief filed by Bre Leonna Thomason and Norcisse Prisca Thomason. [Entered: 07/01/2026 12:20 PM] |
| Filing 49 Appellee's Brief filed by Appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.. [26-10057] (ECF: Christopher Bottcher) [Entered: 06/22/2026 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 48 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Bailee T. Curtis For Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Related cases? Yes. [26-10057] (ECF: Bailee Curtis) [Entered: 06/18/2026 08:31 PM] |
| Filing 47 Notice of e-filing deficiency issued to Steven Clayton Thomason. The motion for summary reversal and renewed motion to vacate state-court ejectment were incorrectly filed as notices. They must be filed as motions. The time for renewing these motions has expired. Please correctly file the motions within 7 days from this date. [Entered: 06/18/2026 08:14 AM] |
| Filing 46 ***Docketed in Error***Notice of motion to be renewed after reinstatement filed by Party Steven Clayton Thomason: Motion to vacate court's order [ # 31 ]. [26-10057]--[Edited 06/18/2026 by JC] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 06/17/2026 08:25 AM] |
| Filing 45 MOTION Renewed Motion to Strike (Doc 30) filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [45] [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 06/17/2026 12:41 AM] |
| Filing 44 ***Docketed in Error***Notice of motion to be renewed after reinstatement filed by Party Steven Clayton Thomason: Motion for summary reversal [ # 29 ]. [26-10057]--[Edited 06/18/2026 by JC] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 06/17/2026 12:01 AM] |
| Filing 43 REPLY to RESPONSE to Motion [ # 39 ] filed by Appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.. [26-10057] (ECF: Christopher Bottcher) [Entered: 06/15/2026 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 42 RESPONSE to Motion to consolidate appeals filed by Appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. [ # 39 ] filed by Party Steven Clayton Thomason. [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 06/11/2026 07:12 PM] |
| Filing 41 Notice of deficient Response to Motion filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Incorrect Event used to file a document. Counsel must file the document using the correct event within 5 days. [Entered: 06/11/2026 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 40 **ERROR**SEE RESPONSE AT DE# 42** MOTION to adopt motions or responses filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Motion is Opposed. [40] [26-10057]--[Edited 06/12/2026 by MDT] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 06/11/2026 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 39 MOTION to consolidate appeals 26-10377 & 26-10057 filed by Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [39] [26-10057] (ECF: Christopher Bottcher) [Entered: 06/10/2026 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 38 Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES - 1 copies] by Party Steven Clayton Thomason. [Entered: 05/20/2026 09:36 AM] |
Filing 37
ORDER: The motion to reinstate filed by the Appellant(s) is hereby GRANTED. The parties have 14 days after the date of this order to file a notice with the Clerk specifying which motions mooted by the dismissal of this appeal, if any, are to be renewed. The time for filing a response to any renewed motion runs from the date the opposing partys notice is docketed. Parties seeking to renew a motion after the 14-day renewal period expires will be required to refile the motion. [ # 33 ], [ # 36 ] BL and NGA (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 05/20/2026 09:31 AM]
|
| Filing 36 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [36] [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 05/15/2026 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 35 Notice that no action will be taken on Corrected Motion to reinstate appeal [ # 34 ] filed by Appellant Steven Clayton ThomasonParty Steven Clayton Thomason. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The appendix is deficient. Its missing a cover page, the order being appealed (Document 31), and the clerks judgment (Document 32). [Entered: 05/08/2026 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 34 Corrected Motion to reinstate appeal [ # 33 ] filed by Appellant Steven Clayton Thomason. [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 05/07/2026 11:26 PM] |
| Filing 33 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [33] [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 03/29/2026 11:34 PM] |
|
Filing 32
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-2(c), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Bre Leonna Thomason, Norcisse Prisca Thomason and Steven Clayton Thomason failed to file an appendix within the time fixed by the rules; Motion is MOOT [ # 28 ]; Motion for summary reversal is MOOT [ # 29 ]; Motion to strike is MOOT [ # 30 ]; Motion to vacate court's order is MOOT [ # 31 ] [Entered: 03/23/2026 09:43 AM]
|
| Filing 31 MOTION to vacate court's order filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [31] [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 03/15/2026 11:04 PM] |
| Filing 30 MOTION to strike APPELLANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE APPELLEE'S FILINGS FOR FAILURE TO FILE A VALID CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS UNDER 11TH CIR. R. 26.1?5(c) filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [30] [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 03/15/2026 10:31 PM] |
| Filing 29 MOTION for summary reversal filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [29] [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 03/15/2026 10:03 PM] |
| Filing 28 MOTION Appellee respectfully asks this Court to note on the docket that the motions Appellant claimed were "unopposed" are, in fact, contested, and grant any further relief the Court deems necessary and appropriate, including permitting Appellee to fully brief. filed by Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.. Motion is Opposed. [28] [26-10057] (ECF: Christopher Bottcher) [Entered: 03/13/2026 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 27 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Christopher Allen Bottcher for Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.. Related cases? No. [26-10057] (ECF: Christopher Bottcher) [Entered: 03/13/2026 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 25 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Christopher Allen Bottcher for Appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10057] (ECF: Christopher Bottcher) [Entered: 03/13/2026 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 24 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Christopher Allen Bottcher for Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.. Related cases? No. [26-10057] (ECF: Christopher Bottcher) [Entered: 03/13/2026 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 23 Notice of deficient Certificate of Interested Persons filed by Christopher Allen Bottcher for Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. Incorrect Document Attached to Event. Also counsel must file a Appearance of Counsel form. See 11th Cir. Rules 46-1, 46-3, and 46-4. [Entered: 03/13/2026 08:09 AM] |
| Filing 26 Appellant's brief filed by Bre Leonna Thomason, Norcisse Prisca Thomason and Steven Clayton Thomason. [Entered: 03/13/2026 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 22 **FILED IN ERROR**Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Christopher Allen Bottcher for Appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10057]--[Edited 03/13/2026 by MDT] (ECF: Christopher Bottcher) [Entered: 03/12/2026 04:32 PM] |
|
Filing 21
ORDER: Motion to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Steven Clayton Thomason is GRANTED by clerk [ # 20 ]. [Entered: 03/12/2026 10:14 AM]
|
| Filing 20 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Motion is Unopposed. [20] [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 03/11/2026 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 19 Notice that no action will be taken on Notice of motion to be renewed after reinstatement (Motion for Clarification) filed by Appellants Bre Leonna Thomason, Norcisse Prisca Thomason and Steven Clayton ThomasonParty Steven Clayton Thomason. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): This appeal is closed. A motion to remedy the default(s) has not been filed. See 11th Cir. Rules 42-1(b), 42-2(e), and 42-3(e). Additionally, the filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules for Certificate of Compliance. See FRAP 32(g)(1). [Entered: 03/09/2026 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 18 Notice of motion to be renewed after reinstatement filed by Party Steven Clayton Thomason: Motion [ # 10 ], Motion [ # 10 ], Motion [ # 10 ], Motion [ # 10 ], Motion [ # 13 ]. [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 03/09/2026 09:09 AM] |
| Filing 17 Notice that no action will be taken on Appellant's Brief filed by Appellants Bre Leonna Thomason, Norcisse Prisca Thomason and Steven Clayton ThomasonParty Steven Clayton Thomason. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): This appeal is closed. A motion to remedy the default(s) has not been filed. See 11th Cir. Rules 42-1(b), 42-2(e), and 42-3(e).. [Entered: 03/09/2026 07:54 AM] |
| Filing 16 **NO ACTION TAKEN**Appellant's brief filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 03/06/2026 11:22 PM] |
| Filing 15 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Party Steven Clayton Thomason. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 03/06/2026 10:25 PM] |
| Filing 14 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to adopt brief [ # 13 ] filed by Appellants Bre Leonna Thomason, Norcisse Prisca Thomason and Steven Clayton ThomasonParty Steven Clayton Thomason. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): Incorrect Event used to file a document. Additionally, the filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules for Certificate of Compliance. See FRAP 32(g)(1). [Entered: 03/06/2026 07:44 AM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION to adopt brief filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Motion is Unopposed. [13] [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 03/05/2026 03:34 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-2(c), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Steven Clayton Thomason has failed to file an appellant's brief within the time fixed by the rules; Motion is MOOT [ # 10 ]; Motion to certify question is MOOT [ # 10 ]; Motion for Leave to File Out of Time is MOOT [ # 10 ]; Motion for extension to file response to jurisdictional question is MOOT [ # 10 ] [Entered: 03/02/2026 03:50 PM]
|
| Filing 10 MOTION Motion to File Out of Time with Corrected Response to Jurisdictional Question Attached, to certify question, for leave to file Motion to File Out of Time with Corrected Response to Jurisdictional Question Attached out of time, for extension of time to file a response to the Jurisdictional Question to 02/26/2026 filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Motion is Unopposed. [10] [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 02/27/2026 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 9 Notice that no action will be taken on Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellant Steven Clayton ThomasonParty Steven Clayton Thomason. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): A motion to file the document(s) out of time has not been filed. See 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b). [Entered: 02/26/2026 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 8 Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellant Steven Clayton Thomason [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 02/26/2026 03:19 AM] |
| Filing 7 JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Bre Leonna Thomason, Norcisse Prisca Thomason and Steven Clayton Thomason. [Entered: 02/10/2026 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by SSGT (Ret) Bre Leonna Thomason Pro Se Norcisse Prisca Thomason Pro SE Party Steven Clayton Thomason. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10057] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 01/29/2026 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Steven Clayton Thomason. The appellant's brief is due on or before 02/17/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 01/26/2026 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Steven Clayton Thomason. You have failed to file the CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 01/26/2026 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 3 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party Steven Clayton Thomason. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 01/26/2026 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 2 Notice of receipt: DC fee payment as to Appellant Steven Clayton Thomason. [Entered: 01/26/2026 11:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
