In re: Mark Stinson
| In re: MARK T. STINSON |
| KEVIN G. RITZ, WILLIAM BATEMAN, III, MARY H. MORRIS, JOHN T FOWLKES, DANNY J. BOGGS, ALICE M. BATCHELDER, JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, DORIS RANDLE-HOLT, DAVID M BELL, UNKNOWN UNITED STATES MARSHALL OFFICERS, WITNEY BAILEY, KAYLA JONES, ANTHONY ALEXANDER, EDWIN G. TORRES, YVONNE RODRIGUEZ-SCHACK, MARC CHATTAH, MAEANN DUNKER, U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 26-10161 |
| January 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 53 EMERGENCY MOTION for leave to file addendum., to take judicial notice, to expedite ruling on a motion filed by Mark T. Stinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [53] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 07/10/2026 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 52 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to vacate clerk's order [ # 50 ], Motion to expedite ruling on a motion [ # 50 ], Motion to expedite [ # 49 ], Motion to recall mandate [ # 49 ] filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): DEs 49 and 50 request rulings on DEs 44 and 46, which were both denied in the June 26 order (DE 48). No further relief is available to Petitioner in this closed case. [Entered: 07/10/2026 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 51 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to expedite ruling on a motion [ # 47 ], Motion for issuance of mandate [ # 47 ] filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The mandate has already issued [Entered: 07/10/2026 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 50 EMERGENCY MOTION to vacate clerk's order, to expedite ruling on a motion filed by Mark T. Stinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [50] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 07/02/2026 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 49 EMERGENCY MOTION to expedite, to recall mandate filed by Mark T. Stinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [49] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 07/01/2026 10:20 AM] |
Filing 48
ORDER: Motion of objection to clerical consolidation filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson is DENIED. [ # 44 ]; Motion for accommodations filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson is DENIED. [ # 46 ] AJ, NGA and EJK (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 06/26/2026 02:20 PM]
|
| Filing 47 TIME SENSITIVE MOTION to expedite ruling on a motion, for issuance of mandate filed by Mark T. Stinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [47] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 06/22/2026 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 46 EMERGENCY MOTION request for ADA accommodation under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act., to expedite ruling on a motion filed by Mark T. Stinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [46] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 06/04/2026 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 45 Supplemental Authority in Support of Rehearing filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 06/02/2026 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 44 EMERGENCY MOTION of objection to clerical consolidation, to expedite ruling on a motion filed by Mark T. Stinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [44] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 05/27/2026 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 43 Notice that no action will be taken on Petition for rehearing filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): Successive motions for reconsideration are not permitted. See 11th Cir. R. 27-3. Further, the case is closed. [Entered: 04/28/2026 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 42 Petition for rehearing en banc (with panel rehearing) filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 04/28/2026 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 41 Notice that no action will be taken on Supplemental Authority filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): This case is closed. [Entered: 04/28/2026 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 40 Notice that no action will be taken on Response filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): This case is closed. [Entered: 04/28/2026 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 39 Supplemental Authority filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 04/28/2026 07:31 AM] |
| Filing 38 Response filed by Mark T. Stinson pursuant to court order dated 04/24/2026. [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 04/27/2026 12:05 PM] |
|
Filing 37
ORDER: Accordingly, Stinsons construed motion for a panel rehearing is DENIED because he has failed to allege any point of law or fact that this Court misapprehended or overlooked in denying his mandamus/prohibition petition. Because Stinsons construed motion for a panel rehearing is denied, his requests that this Court grant him reasonable accommodations under the ADA and Rehabilitation Act and [f]ormally recognize [him] as a disabled lit-igant entitled to reasonable accommodation are DENIED as moot. [ # 32 ] AJ, NGA and EJK (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 04/24/2026 01:37 PM]
|
| Filing 36 Supplemental Authority in Support of Rehearing filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 04/24/2026 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 35 Supplemental Authority in Support of Rehearing filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 04/21/2026 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 34 Notice to the Court of ongoing district court actions, but material motions remain unresolved in the district court: filed by Party Mark T. Stinson. [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 04/17/2026 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 33 This is a notice to the Court to inform the Court of the district court ongoing activity filed by Party Mark T. Stinson. [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 04/15/2026 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 32 MOTION for reconsideration of a panel order entered on 03/26/2026 CONSTRUED from Petition for rehearing en banc (with panel rehearing) filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [32] --[Edited 04/01/2026 by KJK] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 04/01/2026 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 31 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to expedite ruling on a motion [ # 30 ], Motion to remand in full [ # 30 ] filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): This case is closed. [Entered: 03/31/2026 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 30 EMERGENCY MOTION to expedite ruling on a motion, to REMAND this appeal in full to the District Court filed by Mark T. Stinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [30] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 03/31/2026 08:14 AM] |
|
Filing 29
ORDER: Accordingly, Stinsons supplemented mandamus/prohibition petition is hereby DENIED. His motion to proceed as a disabled veteran and motion for an expedited ruling are DENIED as moot because of the denial of his petition. To the extent that they can be construed as motions, all of Stinsons other additional filings are DENIED as moot because they were filed in relation to his petition that has been denied. [ # 1 ] [ # 2 ] [ # 16 ] [ # 18 ] [ # 14 ] [ # 19 ] [ # 26 ] [ # 18 ] [ # 15 ] [ # 14 ] [ # 23 ] [ # 22 ] [ # 19 ] [ # 26 ] [ # 28 ] [ # 15 ] [ # 26 ] [ # 25 ] [ # 24 ] [ # 23 ] [ # 22 ] [ # 19 ] [ # 26 ] [ # 28 ] [ # 22 ] AJ, NGA and EJK (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 03/26/2026 02:58 PM]
|
| Filing 28 EMERGENCY MOTION to expedite ruling on a motion, to REMAND this appeal in full to the District Court filed by Mark T. Stinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [28] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 03/24/2026 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 27 THIS IS AN EMERGENCY NOTICE OF PROPOSED ORDER THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ATTACHED TO DE # 26 filed by Party Mark T. Stinson. [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 03/20/2026 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 26 MOTION to amend petition CONSTRUED from "EMERGENCY MOTION to expedite ruling on a motion, to REMAND this appeal in full to the District Court" filed by Mark T. Stinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [26] --[Edited 03/19/2026 by KJK] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 03/19/2026 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 25 MOTION to amend petition CONSTRUED from "EMERGENCY MOTION to expedite ruling on a motion, to REMAND this appeal in full to the District Court" filed by Mark T. Stinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [25] --[Edited 03/17/2026 by KJK] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 03/16/2026 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 24 MOTION to amend petiton CONSTRUED from "EMERGENCY MOTION to expedite ruling on a motion, to REMAND this appeal in full to the District Court" filed by Mark T. Stinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [24] --[Edited 03/12/2026 by KJK] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 03/12/2026 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 23 EMERGENCY MOTION to expedite ruling on a motion, to REMAND this appeal in full to the District Court filed by Mark T. Stinson. Motion is Unopposed. [23] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 03/11/2026 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 22 EMERGENCY MOTION to expedite ruling on a motion, to stay lower court proceedings, to REMAND this appeal in full to the District Court filed by Mark T. Stinson. Motion is Unopposed. [22] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 03/05/2026 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 21 Notice that no action will be taken on DE#20, Notice filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing appears intended for another court. [Entered: 02/24/2026 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 20 I attempted to file these documents with the Southern District of Florida but was denied access to the Court and is requesting that this Court file with the SDFL or take other action in this Court filed by Party Mark T. Stinson. [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 02/20/2026 05:29 PM] |
| Filing 19 EMERGENCY MOTION to expedite, to expedite ruling on a motion, to REMAND this appeal in full to the District Court filed by Mark T. Stinson. Motion is Unopposed. [19] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 02/19/2026 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 18 EMERGENCY MOTION to expedite, to expedite ruling on a motion filed by Mark T. Stinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [18] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 02/13/2026 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 17 Fee Amount: $600.00 Receipt Number: A11-117533-191. Submitted for Petitioner Mark T. Stinson [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 02/12/2026 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Motion is Unopposed [16] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 02/11/2026 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 15 Motion to amend petition CONSTRUED from EMERGENCY MOTION to expedite ruling on a motion filed by Mark T. Stinson. Motion is Unopposed. [15] [26-10161] [Edited 01/30/2026 by KJK] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 01/29/2026 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 14 EMERGENCY MOTION to expedite, to expedite ruling on a motion filed by Mark T. Stinson. Motion is Unopposed. [14] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 01/29/2026 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 13 Notice that no action will be taken on DE#11 filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): Incorrect Event used to file a document. [Entered: 01/29/2026 08:37 AM] |
| Filing 12 Notice that no action will be taken on DE#10 filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): Incorrect Event used to file a document. [Entered: 01/29/2026 08:35 AM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MATERIAL DISTRICT COURT ACTION AND REQUEST FOR REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS filed by Party Mark T. Stinson. [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 01/28/2026 06:58 AM] |
| Filing 10 that the district judge and all parties has been served with a copy of the emergency writ of mandamus and for accommodations filed by Party Mark T. Stinson. [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 01/28/2026 06:39 AM] |
| Filing 9 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to supplement the record [ # 8 ], Motion to expedite [ # 8 ], Motion to expedite ruling on a motion [ # 8 ] filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): Incorrect Event used to file a document. [Entered: 01/27/2026 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 8 EMERGENCY MOTION to supplement the record, to expedite, to expedite ruling on a motion filed by Mark T. Stinson. Motion is Unopposed. [8] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 01/27/2026 08:46 AM] |
| Filing 7 Notice that no action will be taken on Supplemental Authority filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): Incorrect Event used to file a document. [Entered: 01/26/2026 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 6 Supplemental Authority filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 01/26/2026 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 5 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to expedite [ # 3 ], Motion to remand on a limited basis [ # 3 ], Motion to expedite ruling on a motion [ # 3 ] filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): Incorrect Event used to file a document. [Entered: 01/20/2026 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 4 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. [Entered: 01/20/2026 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 EMERGENCY MOTION to expedite, to remand this appeal on a limited basis., to expedite ruling on a motion filed by Mark T. Stinson. Motion is Unopposed. [3] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 01/20/2026 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Motion is Unopposed [2] [26-10161] (ECF: Mark Stinson) [Entered: 01/20/2026 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. Petition for WRIT of MANDAMUS filed by Petitioner Mark T. Stinson. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 01/20/2026 11:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
