Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Steven Thomason
Plaintiff: DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
Defendant: STEVEN CLAYTON THOMASON
Claimant: NORCISSE PRISCA THOMASON and BRE LEONNA THOMASON
Case Number: 26-10377
Filed: February 3, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2026 Filing 26 REPLY to RESPONSE to Motion [ # 20 ] filed by Appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. [26-10377] (ECF: Christopher Bottcher) [Entered: 06/15/2026 04:01 PM]
June 12, 2026 Filing 25 NOTICE: The motion at DE# 11 could not be renewed, as No Action was Taken on this motion on April 20, 2026. Please see DE# 13. [Entered: 06/12/2026 11:09 AM]
June 11, 2026 Filing 24 Notice of motion to be renewed after reinstatement filed by Party Steven Clayton Thomason: Motion [ # 7 ]. [26-10377] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 06/11/2026 06:14 PM]
June 11, 2026 Filing 23 RESPONSE to Motion filed by Appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Company [ # 22 ] filed by Party Steven Clayton Thomason. [26-10377] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 06/11/2026 09:21 AM]
June 10, 2026 Filing 22 MOTION to consolidate appeals 26-10377 & 26-10057 filed by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [22] [26-10377] (ECF: Christopher Bottcher) [Entered: 06/10/2026 05:06 PM]
June 10, 2026 Filing 21 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to consolidate appeals [ # 20 ] filed by Attorney Christopher Allen Bottcher for Appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificate of Compliance. See FRAP 32(g)(1). Also, the motion must be filed in both appeals that are to be consolidated. [Entered: 06/10/2026 09:30 AM]
June 10, 2026 Filing 20 **NO ACTION TAKEN** MOTION to consolidate appeals 26-10057 and 26-10377 filed by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [20] [26-10377]--[Edited 06/10/2026 by MDT] (ECF: Christopher Bottcher) [Entered: 06/10/2026 08:01 AM]
June 4, 2026 Filing 19 Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES - 1 copies] by Party Steven Clayton Thomason. [Entered: 06/04/2026 12:26 PM]
June 4, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: The motion to reinstate filed by the Appellant is hereby GRANTED. The parties have 14 days after the date of this order to file a notice with the Clerk specifying which motions mooted by the dismissal of this appeal, if any, are to be renewed. The time for filing a response to any renewed motion runs from the date the opposing partys notice is docketed. Parties seeking to renew a motion after the 14-day renewal period expires will be required to refile the motion. [ # 17 ] JP and BCG (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 06/04/2026 12:24 PM]
May 18, 2026 Filing 17 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [17] [26-10377] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 05/18/2026 05:36 PM]
May 18, 2026 Filing 16 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to reinstate appeal [ # 15 ] filed by Appellant Steven Clayton ThomasonParty Steven Clayton Thomason. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The deficiencies that caused this case to be dismissed have not been remedied, as the appendix is missing a cover page, the order being appealed (Doc. 31), and the judgment (Doc. 32). [Entered: 05/18/2026 08:31 AM]
May 7, 2026 Filing 15 **NO ACTION TAKEN** MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [15] [26-10377]--[Edited 05/18/2026 by MDT] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 05/07/2026 05:29 PM]
April 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-2(c), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Steven Clayton Thomason failed to file an appendix within the time fixed by the rules; Motion for reconsideration of panel order is MOOT [ # 7 ]; Motion to vacate court's order is MOOT [ # 8 ] [Entered: 04/22/2026 03:50 PM]
April 20, 2026 Filing 13 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for reconsideration of panel order [ # 11 ] filed by Appellant Steven Clayton Thomason on behalf of Party Bre Leonna Thomason and Norcisse Prisca Thomason. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): Steven Thomason is not permitted to file an appellant's brief on behalf of Bre Leonna Thomason and Norcisse Prisca Thomason. [Entered: 04/20/2026 02:29 PM]
April 20, 2026 Filing 12 Notice that no action will be taken on Appellant's Brief filed by Appellant Steven Clayton Thomason on behalf of Party Bre Leonna Thomason and Norcisse Prisca Thomason. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): Steven Thomason is not permitted to file an appellant's brief on behalf of Bre Leonna Thomason and Norcisse Prisca Thomason. [Entered: 04/20/2026 02:27 PM]
April 16, 2026 Filing 11 **NO ACTION TAKEN** MOTION for reconsideration of a panel order entered on 04/07/2026 filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Motion is Unopposed. [11] [26-10377]--[Edited 04/20/2026 by MDT] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 04/16/2026 03:07 PM]
April 15, 2026 Filing 10 **NO ACTION TAKEN**Appellant's brief filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. [26-10377]--[Edited 04/20/2026 by MDT] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 04/15/2026 11:52 PM]
April 14, 2026 Filing 9 Appellant's brief filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. [26-10377] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 04/14/2026 11:52 PM]
April 12, 2026 Filing 8 MOTION to vacate court's order filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8] [26-10377] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 04/12/2026 02:21 PM]
April 12, 2026 Filing 7 MOTION for reconsideration of a panel order entered on 04/07/2026 filed by Steven Clayton Thomason. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [7] [26-10377] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 04/12/2026 10:19 AM]
April 7, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: This appeal is DISMISSED IN PART, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Steven Thomason, Norcisse Thomason, and Bre Thomason appeal the district courts order imposing sanctions that was entered against only Steven. The district court entered judgment on that order. We conclude that we do not have jurisdiction over Norcisse and Bre Thomasons appeal because they lack appellate standing. AJ, JP and EJK (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 04/07/2026 01:11 PM]
March 16, 2026 Filing 5 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Party Steven Clayton Thomason. Appellants brief due on 04/15/2026 as to Appellant Steven Clayton Thomason. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 03/16/2026 02:54 PM]
February 26, 2026 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Party Steven Clayton Thomason. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10377] (ECF: Steven Thomason) [Entered: 02/26/2026 03:53 AM]
February 20, 2026 Filing 3 Briefing Notice issued to Appellants Bre Leonna Thomason, Norcisse Prisca Thomason and Steven Clayton Thomason. The appellant's brief is due on or before 03/16/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 02/20/2026 03:18 PM]
February 20, 2026 Filing 2 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party Steven Clayton Thomason. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 02/20/2026 03:13 PM]
February 3, 2026 Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Bre Leonna Thomason, Norcisse Prisca Thomason and Steven Clayton Thomason on 02/03/2026. Fee Status: Fee Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 02/04/2026 11:50 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Steven Thomason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
Represented By: Justin K. Sauls
Represented By: Pamela Newsom Lee
Represented By: Christopher Allen Bottcher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEVEN CLAYTON THOMASON
Represented By: Steven Clayton Thomason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: NORCISSE PRISCA THOMASON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: BRE LEONNA THOMASON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?