NetApp Inc. v. Jon Stefansson
| NETAPP INC. |
| JON THORGRIMUR STEFANSSON |
| SERVICE |
| 26-10482 |
| February 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
ORDER: Appellants motion to expedite the appeal is GRANTED IN PART to the extent the Court adopts the following expedited briefing schedule. Appellees response brief is due April 22, 2026. Appellants reply brief, if any, is due May 13, 2026. The motion is otherwise DENIED. [ # 9 ] EJK (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 04/02/2026 02:51 PM]
|
| Filing 22 Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Appellant NetApp Inc.. [26-10482] (ECF: Blaine Evanson) [Entered: 03/20/2026 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 21 Appellant's brief filed by NetApp Inc.. [26-10482] (ECF: Blaine Evanson) [Entered: 03/20/2026 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 20 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Blaine Evanson for Appellant NetApp Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10482] (ECF: Blaine Evanson) [Entered: 03/11/2026 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Alyson M. Cox for NetApp Inc., Blaine Evanson for NetApp Inc., Elizabeth A. Kiernan for NetApp Inc. and Katherine K. Vidal for NetApp Inc.. You have failed to file the CIP and failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 03/11/2026 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 18 REPLY to RESPONSE to Motion [ # 9 ] filed by Appellant NetApp Inc.. [26-10482] (ECF: Blaine Evanson) [Entered: 03/04/2026 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE to Motion to expedite filed by Appellant NetApp Inc. [ # 9 ] filed by Attorney Ian M. Ross for Appellee Jon Thorgrimur Stefansson. [26-10482] (ECF: Ian Ross) [Entered: 02/26/2026 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 16 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Ian M. Ross for Appellee Jon Thorgrimur Stefansson. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10482] (ECF: Ian Ross) [Entered: 02/23/2026 07:21 PM] |
| Filing 15 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Abigail Bachrach for Jon Thorgrimur Stefansson. Related cases? No. [26-10482] (ECF: Abigail Bachrach) [Entered: 02/23/2026 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Nathaniel Love for Jon Thorgrimur Stefansson Related cases? No. [26-10482] (ECF: Nathaniel Love) [Entered: 02/23/2026 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 13 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 02/23/2026 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 12 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant NetApp Inc.. The appellant's brief is due on or before 03/24/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 02/19/2026 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 11 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Attorney Blaine Evanson for Appellant NetApp Inc.. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 02/19/2026 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Katherine K. Vidal for NetApp Inc.. Related cases? No. [26-10482] (ECF: Katherine Vidal) [Entered: 02/18/2026 06:41 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to expedite filed by NetApp Inc.. Motion is Opposed. [9] [26-10482] (ECF: Blaine Evanson) [Entered: 02/18/2026 06:16 PM] |
| Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Blaine Evanson for Appellant NetApp Inc.. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [26-10482] (ECF: Blaine Evanson) [Entered: 02/18/2026 05:59 PM] |
| Filing 7 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Blaine Evanson for Appellant NetApp Inc.. Related cases? No. [26-10482] (ECF: Blaine Evanson) [Entered: 02/18/2026 05:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Alyson M. Cox for NetApp Inc. Related cases? No. [26-10482] (ECF: Alyson Cox) [Entered: 02/18/2026 05:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Elizabeth A. Kiernan for NetApp Inc. Related cases? No. [26-10482] (ECF: Elizabeth Kiernan) [Entered: 02/18/2026 05:55 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Blaine Evanson for NetApp Inc.. Related cases? No. [26-10482] (ECF: Blaine Evanson) [Entered: 02/18/2026 05:53 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jennifer Martin Wheeler for Jon Thorgrimur Stefansson. Related cases? No. [26-10482] (ECF: Jennifer Wheeler) [Entered: 02/17/2026 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Ian M. Ross for Jon Thorgrimur Stefansson. Related cases? No. [26-10482] (ECF: Ian Ross) [Entered: 02/17/2026 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant NetApp Inc. on 02/11/2026. Fee Status: Fee Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 02/12/2026 12:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
