Jonathan Lewis v. Chief Judge of the 17th Judicial Circuit Court
| JONATHAN KYLE LEWIS |
| CHIEF JUDGE OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT |
| 26-10513 |
| February 17, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Jonathan Kyle Lewis has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 08/04/2026 09:37 AM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Jonathan Kyle Lewis is DENIED. [ # 2 ] EJK (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 07/16/2026 02:17 PM]
|
| Filing 10 Notice of receipt: Declaration as to Appellant Jonathan Kyle Lewis.. [Entered: 07/07/2026 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 9 Notice of receipt: Declaration as to Appellant Jonathan Kyle Lewis.. [Entered: 06/26/2026 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 7 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for extension of time to file IFP motion [ # 6 ], Motion for extension of time to file IFP motion [ # 5 ] filed by Appellant Jonathan Kyle Lewis. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The Motion is unnecessary. There is a pending Motion for IFP on the docket at DE 2. [Entered: 05/22/2026 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 8 Supplemental MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Jonathan Kyle Lewis. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8] [Entered: 05/26/2026 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for extension of time to file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis to 06/22/2026 filed by Appellant Jonathan Kyle Lewis. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 05/22/2026 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION for extension of time to file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis to 06/10/2026 filed by Appellant Jonathan Kyle Lewis. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [5] [Entered: 05/22/2026 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 4 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Jonathan Kyle Lewis was filed on 02/17/2026. Docket Entry 19. [Entered: 03/20/2026 09:44 AM] |
| Filing 3 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Jonathan Kyle Lewis. [Entered: 03/02/2026 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Jonathan Kyle Lewis. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [2] [Entered: 03/02/2026 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jonathan Kyle Lewis on 02/17/2026. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis DE 17 filed on 02/17/2026. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 02/18/2026 11:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jonathan Lewis v. Chief Judge of the 17th Judicial Circuit Court | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JONATHAN KYLE LEWIS | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Kyle Lewis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CHIEF JUDGE OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
