In re: James Doby, III
| In re: JAMES DOUGLAS DOBY, III |
| DEANDREA TOWNES, WILLIAM BEAVER, ANALISE WALKER, JOHN DOE and SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS |
| 26-10597 |
| February 25, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this petition is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Petitioner James Douglas Doby, III failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the clerk of this court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 05/22/2026 02:53 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Motion for leave to proceed construed from consent form filed by Petitioner James Douglas Doby, III is DENIED. [ # 7 ]; Motion for leave to proceed filed by Petitioner James Douglas Doby, III is DENIED. [ # 2 ] NGA (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 04/27/2026 10:45 AM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal construed from appellants consent form filed by Petitioner James Douglas Doby, III. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [Entered: 04/16/2026 08:46 AM] |
| Filing 6 Consent Form filed by Petitioner James Douglas Doby, III. [Entered: 03/24/2026 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed filed by Petitioner James Douglas Doby, III. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [2] [Entered: 02/27/2026 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. Petition for WRIT of MANDAMUS filed by Petitioner James Douglas Doby, III. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 02/27/2026 11:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
