David Bryan, et al v. City of Orlando
Plaintiff: DAVID BRYAN and KIERRA THOMAS
Defendant: CITY OF ORLANDO
Case Number: 26-10606
Filed: February 25, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-2(c), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant David Bryan and Kierra Thomas has failed to file an appellant's brief within the time fixed by the rules. [Entered: 04/15/2026 08:27 AM]
April 2, 2026 Filing 9 Returned Mail was received for Party David Bryan. IN RE: 03/13/2026 briefing notice. [Entered: 04/03/2026 08:36 AM]
March 25, 2026 Filing 8 Returned Mail was received for Party David Bryan. IN RE: February 26, 2026, CIVIL - Notice of Docketing [Entered: 03/26/2026 08:07 AM]
March 25, 2026 Filing 7 Returned Mail was received for Party Kierra Thomas. IN RE: February 26, 2026, CIVIL - Notice of Docketing [Entered: 03/26/2026 08:05 AM]
March 13, 2026 Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10606] (ECF: Matthew Carson) [Entered: 03/13/2026 02:33 PM]
March 13, 2026 Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Matthew Joseph Carson for City of Orlando. Related cases? No. [26-10606] (ECF: Matthew Carson) [Entered: 03/13/2026 02:24 PM]
March 13, 2026 Filing 4 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant David Bryan. The appellant's brief is due on or before 04/06/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 03/13/2026 12:28 PM]
March 13, 2026 Filing 3 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party David Bryan. No hearings. [Entered: 03/13/2026 12:27 PM]
March 13, 2026 Filing 2 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant David Bryan. [Entered: 03/13/2026 12:27 PM]
February 25, 2026 Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants David Bryan and Kierra Thomas on 02/24/2026. Fee Status: IFP Granted. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 02/26/2026 09:32 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Bryan, et al v. City of Orlando
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID BRYAN
Represented By: David Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KIERRA THOMAS
Represented By: Kierra Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF ORLANDO
Represented By: Kimberly Laskoff
Represented By: Alexander James Karden
Represented By: Matthew Joseph Carson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?