Keith Doherty v. Mark Borrow, et al
| KEITH ROBERT DOHERTY |
| MARK BORROW and MARK PHILLIPS |
| SERVICE |
| 26-10621 |
| February 25, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Keith R. Doherty, Court Reporter: Joanne Mancari, Proceeding Type and Date: Pre-Trial Proceedings 08/23/2024 , Pre-Trial Proceedings 10/22/2024 , Pre-Trial Proceedings 11/18/2024. [Entered: 04/24/2026 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 14 The briefing schedule issued to Appellant Keith Robert Doherty is hereby rescinded for the following reason(s): Transcripts are being ordered. When the above matter(s) is resolved, the clerk will issue a notice advising counsel and the parties of the new schedule for filing briefs in this appeal. [Entered: 04/22/2026 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 13 Notice of receipt: "Notice in response to briefing notice dated 03/23/26" as to Appellant Keith Robert Doherty.. [Entered: 04/15/2026 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion filed by Appellant Keith Robert Doherty [ # 11 ] filed by Attorney Andrew Jolly for Appellees Mark Borrow and Mark Phillips. [26-10621] (ECF: Andrew Jolly) [Entered: 04/13/2026 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Keith Robert Doherty. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [11] [Entered: 04/03/2026 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 10 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Keith Robert Doherty. The appellant's brief is due on or before 04/29/2026. [Entered: 03/23/2026 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 9 USDC Order Granting appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees Assessed. Filed on 03/20/2026. Docket Entry 191. [Entered: 03/23/2026 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 8 USDC Motion filed by appellant for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees or consent form. Filed on 03/12/2026. Docket Entry 189. [Entered: 03/17/2026 09:25 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mark Borrow and Mark Phillips Andrew Jolly for Mark Borrow and Mark Phillips. Related cases? No. [26-10621] (ECF: Andrew Jolly) [Entered: 03/13/2026 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Mark Borrow and Mark Phillips Attorney Andrew Jolly for Appellees Mark Borrow and Mark Phillips. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10621] (ECF: Andrew Jolly) [Entered: 03/12/2026 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mark Borrow and Mark Phillips Andrew Jolly for Mark Borrow and Mark Phillips. Related cases? No. [26-10621] (ECF: Andrew Jolly) [Entered: 03/12/2026 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 3 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 2 ] filed by Appellant Keith Robert Doherty. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing appears intended for another court. [Entered: 03/10/2026 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 4 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Keith Robert Doherty. [Entered: 03/10/2026 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Keith Robert Doherty. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [2] [Entered: 03/10/2026 09:44 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Keith Robert Doherty on 02/24/2026. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 02/26/2026 04:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
