Thomas Pepe v. Christopher DeCosta, et al
| THOMAS PEPE |
| CHRISTOPHER DECOSTA, LUKE LAJQI, RALPH CONFREDA, DOUGLAS R. GOLDIN, ANTHONY ALCAIDE, ANTHONY CATTANO, LINDA CATTANO, TIM COCHRAN, SCOTT BROWN and TARA EDWARDS |
| 26-10661 |
| March 3, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 10 ] filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): This case is closed. No motion to reinstate has been filed. [Entered: 04/23/2026 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [10] [Entered: 04/23/2026 11:17 AM] |
| Filing 9 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe in 26-10527, 26-10661. [Entered: 04/22/2026 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 8 Supplemental Authority filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe in 26-10661. [26-10527, 26-10661] [Entered: 04/22/2026 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 7 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 6 ] filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe in 26-10661, 26-10527. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): This case is closed.. [26-10661, 26-10527] [Entered: 04/07/2026 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe in 26-10527, 26-10661. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [26-10527, 26-10661] [Entered: 04/07/2026 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 5 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Thomas Pepe was filed on 04/01/2026. Docket Entry 57. [Entered: 04/01/2026 04:12 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Thomas Pepe failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/01/2026 11:15 AM]
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO PARTIES: Due to the large number of parties associated with this appeal, not all parties from the district court docket have been entered on this Court's docket at this time. The parties may consult the relevant notice(s) of appeal, other case documents, and the district court docket to identify all parties. If any party objects to not having all parties listed on the docket, the party may file an objection stating its reasoning within 14 days after the date of this notice. [Entered: 03/04/2026 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Thomas Pepe on 02/27/2026. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 03/04/2026 10:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
