Larry L. Thomas Jr. v. Peter Leary, et al
| LARRY THOMAS, JR., . |
| PETER D. LEARY, STEPHEN LYNN, PETER KO, MARK TREADWELL, CLAY D. LAND, TILMAN E. SELF, THOMAS Q. LANGSTAFF, CHARLES ASHLEY ROYAL, HUGH LAWSON and M. STEPHEN HYLES |
| 26-10684 |
| March 3, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: This appeal is DISMISSED in part, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Larry Thomas, Jr., proceeding pro se, appeals from the district courts: December 23, 2024 judgment dismissing his complaint; and January 16, 2026 order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d) motion to vacate the judgment. Thomass notice of appeal, however, is timely to challenge the district courts January 16, 2026 order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d) motion. This appeal shall proceed only as to that order. BL, NGA and EJK (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 04/16/2026 02:37 PM]
|
| Filing 5 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Larry Thomas, Jr. was filed on 04/14/2026. Docket Entry 37. [Entered: 04/16/2026 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 4 Notice of receipt: "Supporting Evidence of Fraud on the Court" as to Appellant Larry Thomas, Jr. [Entered: 04/13/2026 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 3 Pre mature Appellant's brief filed by Larry Thomas, Jr.. [Entered: 04/07/2026 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Larry L. Thomas, Jr.. [Entered: 03/25/2026 04:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
