USA v. David Wilson
| DAVID CLARK WILSON |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 26-10808 |
| March 11, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant David Clark Wilson. The appellant's brief is due on or before 06/15/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 05/06/2026 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 13 TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Geraldine Glover, Filer: David C. Wilson, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 05/03/2026, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 02/25/2026. [Entered: 05/06/2026 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 12 USDC order DISMISSING AS MOOT motion for appointment of counsel as to Appellant David Clark Wilson was filed on 04/28/2026. Docket Entry 23. [Entered: 04/30/2026 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Scott J. Forster for Appellant David Clark Wilson. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10808] (ECF: Scott Forster) [Entered: 04/29/2026 08:09 PM] |
| Filing 10 Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Transcript Order: Geraldine Glover, 04/22/2026, David C. Wilson, Sentencing 02/25/2026. [Entered: 04/27/2026 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Scott J. Forster for David Clark Wilson. You have failed to file the CIP and failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 04/22/2026 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: David C. Wilson, Court Reporter: Geraldine Glover, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 02/25/2026. [Entered: 04/22/2026 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Laurel Boatright Milam for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10808] (ECF: Laurel Milam) [Entered: 04/09/2026 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant David Clark Wilson. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files in the District Court a completed Transcript Order Form OR a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered. [Entered: 03/31/2026 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Scott J. Forster for David Clark Wilson. You have failed to file the CIP and failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 03/31/2026 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Laurel Milam for USA Related cases? No. [26-10808] (ECF: Laurel Milam) [Entered: 03/23/2026 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Gabriel A. Mendel for USA Related cases? No. [26-10808] (ECF: Gabriel Mendel) [Entered: 03/17/2026 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 2 CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney Scott J. Forster for Appellant David Clark Wilson. [Entered: 03/12/2026 05:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant David Clark Wilson on 03/09/2026. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appoint Counsel For Appeal DE#15 filed on 03/09/2026. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 03/12/2026 05:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. David Wilson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Georgia |
| Represented By: | Laurel Boatright Milam |
| Represented By: | Gabriel Adam Mendel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DAVID CLARK WILSON | |
| Represented By: | Scott J. Forster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
