USA v. David Wilson
Defendant: DAVID CLARK WILSON
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 26-10808
Filed: March 11, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2026 Filing 22 Notice to Attorney Scott J. Forster, re: Counsel's Failure to Comply with this Court's Rules. Counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to take appropriate action in this appeal. [Entered: 09/04/2026 09:04 AM]
August 10, 2026 Filing 21 Appellant David Clark Wilson is notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files the appendix. If the appellant is represented by appointed counsel, the matter may be referred for consideration of possible disciplinary action against counsel in lieu of dismissal. [Entered: 08/10/2026 01:02 PM]
August 6, 2026 Filing 20 SEALED document, Sealed Exhibits to motion to dismiss appeal due to valid appeal waiver. filed by Appellee USA. [26-10808] (ECF: Gabriel Mendel) [Entered: 08/06/2026 11:04 AM]
August 6, 2026 Filing 19 MOTION to dismiss appeal due to valid appeal waiver filed by USA. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [19] [26-10808] (ECF: Gabriel Mendel) [Entered: 08/06/2026 11:00 AM]
July 21, 2026 Filing 18 Appellant's brief filed by David Clark Wilson. [26-10808] (ECF: Scott Forster) [Entered: 07/21/2026 02:54 PM]
July 6, 2026 Filing 17 Record on Appeal filed. SEALED Transcript (Doc. 24), 1 volume. [Entered: 07/06/2026 04:20 PM]
June 15, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: Motion for extension to file appellant brief filed by Appellant David Clark Wilson is GRANTED by clerk [ # 15 ]. Appellant's brief is due on 07/15/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 06/15/2026 03:58 PM]
June 15, 2026 Filing 15 MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 07/15/2026 filed by David Clark Wilson. Motion is Unopposed. [15] [26-10808] (ECF: Scott Forster) [Entered: 06/15/2026 02:12 PM]
May 6, 2026 Filing 14 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant David Clark Wilson. The appellant's brief is due on or before 06/15/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 05/06/2026 09:52 AM]
May 6, 2026 Filing 13 TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Geraldine Glover, Filer: David C. Wilson, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 05/03/2026, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 02/25/2026. [Entered: 05/06/2026 09:43 AM]
April 30, 2026 Filing 12 USDC order DISMISSING AS MOOT motion for appointment of counsel as to Appellant David Clark Wilson was filed on 04/28/2026. Docket Entry 23. [Entered: 04/30/2026 01:11 PM]
April 29, 2026 Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Scott J. Forster for Appellant David Clark Wilson. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10808] (ECF: Scott Forster) [Entered: 04/29/2026 08:09 PM]
April 27, 2026 Filing 10 Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Transcript Order: Geraldine Glover, 04/22/2026, David C. Wilson, Sentencing 02/25/2026. [Entered: 04/27/2026 01:45 PM]
April 22, 2026 Filing 9 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Scott J. Forster for David Clark Wilson. You have failed to file the CIP and failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 04/22/2026 03:12 PM]
April 22, 2026 Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: David C. Wilson, Court Reporter: Geraldine Glover, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 02/25/2026. [Entered: 04/22/2026 12:16 PM]
April 9, 2026 Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Laurel Boatright Milam for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10808] (ECF: Laurel Milam) [Entered: 04/09/2026 01:43 PM]
March 31, 2026 Filing 6 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant David Clark Wilson. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files in the District Court a completed Transcript Order Form OR a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered. [Entered: 03/31/2026 11:03 AM]
March 31, 2026 Filing 5 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Scott J. Forster for David Clark Wilson. You have failed to file the CIP and failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 03/31/2026 11:03 AM]
March 23, 2026 Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Laurel Milam for USA Related cases? No. [26-10808] (ECF: Laurel Milam) [Entered: 03/23/2026 10:18 AM]
March 17, 2026 Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Gabriel A. Mendel for USA Related cases? No. [26-10808] (ECF: Gabriel Mendel) [Entered: 03/17/2026 10:12 AM]
March 12, 2026 Filing 2 CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney Scott J. Forster for Appellant David Clark Wilson. [Entered: 03/12/2026 05:31 PM]
March 11, 2026 Filing 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant David Clark Wilson on 03/09/2026. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appoint Counsel For Appeal DE#15 filed on 03/09/2026. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 03/12/2026 05:28 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. David Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Georgia
Represented By: Laurel Boatright Milam
Represented By: Gabriel Adam Mendel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID CLARK WILSON
Represented By: Scott J. Forster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?