Noel Thomas v. United States Postal Service, et al
| NOEL THOMAS |
| UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, WALMART, INC., NDC ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, JAMES ALLEN and ANNIE CASTRO |
| 26-10890 |
| March 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 PREMATURE Appellant's brief filed by Noel Thomas. [Entered: 04/29/2026 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 Notice of receipt: "Notice of Additional Filings" as to Appellant Noel Thomas. [Entered: 04/14/2026 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Noel Thomas. [Entered: 04/03/2026 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Noel Thomas. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [4] [Entered: 04/03/2026 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 3 USDC order denying IFP without prejudice as to Appellant Noel Thomas was filed on 03/23/2026. Docket Entry 16. " No later than April 2, 2026, the plaintiff may file an amended motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis that complies with Rule 24(a)(1) and Form 4 of the Appendix of Forms. [Entered: 03/25/2026 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 2 ***Docketed in error***USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Noel Thomas was filed on 03/23/2026. Docket Entry 16.--[Edited 03/25/2026 by FRM] [Entered: 03/24/2026 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Noel Thomas on 03/20/2026. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis, DE # 14 filed on 03/20/2026. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 03/20/2026 11:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.