Pedro Gallegos Navarro, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
| PEDRO DAVID GALLEGOS NAVARRO and RUBI DOREIDE GONZALEZ REYES |
| U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 26-10900 |
| March 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: The motion for an extension of time to and including October 13, 2026, to file Petitioners initial brief is GRANTED, with the appendix due 7 days after the filing of the brief. [ # 11 ] KCN [Entered: 07/31/2026 03:55 PM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 10/13/2026 filed by Pedro David Gallegos Navarro and Rubi Doreide Gonzalez Reyes. Motion is Unopposed. [11] [26-10900] (ECF: Christopher Dempsey) [Entered: 07/30/2026 06:58 PM] |
| Filing 10 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Christopher Westley Dempsey for Petitioners Pedro David Gallegos Navarro and Rubi Doreide Gonzalez Reyes. Appellants brief due on 08/12/2026 as to Petitioner Pedro David Gallegos Navarro. Appendix due within 7 days of the filing of the brief as to Petitioner Pedro David Gallegos Navarro. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 07/02/2026 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 Briefing Notice issued to Petitioner Pedro David Gallegos Navarro. The appellant's brief is due on or before 07/13/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 06/03/2026 07:51 AM] |
| Filing 8 Administrative Agency Record on Appeal Filed. [26-10900] (ECF: DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review) [Entered: 06/03/2026 06:47 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Motion for extension to file agency record filed by Respondent U.S. Attorney General is GRANTED by clerk [ # 6 ]. [Entered: 05/05/2026 11:26 AM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for extension of time to file agency record to 05/29/2026 filed by U.S. Attorney General. Motion is Unopposed. [6] [26-10900] (ECF: Mark Rook) [Entered: 05/05/2026 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Mark Alexander Rook for Respondent U.S. Attorney General. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10900] (ECF: Mark Rook) [Entered: 04/06/2026 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Christopher Westley Dempsey for Petitioners Pedro David Gallegos Navarro and Rubi Doreide Gonzalez Reyes. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10900] (ECF: Christopher Dempsey) [Entered: 04/01/2026 06:59 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Christopher Westley Dempsey for Pedro David Gallegos Navarro and Rubi Doreide Gonzalez Reyes. Related cases? No. [26-10900] (ECF: Christopher Dempsey) [Entered: 04/01/2026 06:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mark A. Rook for Pamela Bondi Related cases? No. [26-10900] (ECF: Mark Rook) [Entered: 03/23/2026 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 1 AGENCY PETITION / APPLICATION DOCKETED. Filed by Petitioners Pedro David Gallegos Navarro and Rubi Doreide Gonzalez Reyes. Additional Documents Needed: CIP. Fee Status: Fee Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 03/23/2026 08:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
