Avondale Hill Holding LP v. James Davis
| AVONDALE HILL HOLDING LP |
| JAMES DAVIS |
| 26-10914 |
| March 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Rent, Lease, Ejectment |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION MOOT: Motion to stay pending appeal is MOOT [ # 4 ] due to clerk's order filed 04/29/2026. Motion filed by Appellant James Davis. [Entered: 04/29/2026 09:13 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant James Davis failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/29/2026 09:11 AM]
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to James Miachaell Williams for Avondale Hill Holding LP. You have failed to file the CIP and failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 04/21/2026 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to James Davis. You have failed to file the CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 04/14/2026 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to stay pending appeal filed by Appellant James Davis. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [4] [Entered: 04/06/2026 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE: Letter to Appellant requesting the status of case. [Entered: 04/02/2026 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant James Davis was filed on 03/23/2026. Docket Entry 12. [Entered: 03/23/2026 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant James Davis on 03/20/2026. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 03/23/2026 03:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Avondale Hill Holding LP v. James Davis | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: AVONDALE HILL HOLDING LP | |
| Represented By: | James Miachaell Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JAMES DAVIS | |
| Represented By: | James Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
