John Cohan v. Jason Calhoun, et al
| JOHN MICHAEL COHAN |
| JASON L. CALHOUN, CHILTON COUNTY COMMISSION and CHILTON COUNTY PROBATE COURT |
| 26-10943 |
| March 24, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: Motion to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant John Michael Cohan is GRANTED by clerk [ # 4 ]. [Entered: 05/06/2026 03:44 PM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant John Michael Cohan. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9] [Entered: 05/06/2026 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 8 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant John Michael Cohan. [Entered: 05/06/2026 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 5 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant John Michael Cohan was filed on 04/23/2026. Docket Entry 91. [Entered: 04/27/2026 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 6 Notice of receipt: Notice of mail delay as to Appellant John Michael Cohan.. [Entered: 04/30/2026 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 3 USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant John Michael Cohan was filed on 04/20/2026. Docket Entry 89. [Entered: 04/21/2026 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant John Michael Cohan. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [4] [Entered: 04/21/2026 12:33 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant John Michael Cohan failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/15/2026 09:28 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
