David Clayman v. Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury, et al
Plaintiff: DAVID MORRIS CLAYMAN
Defendant: SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE, CHAIR, U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE, COMPTROLLER GENERAL and PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
Case Number: 26-10993
Filed: March 25, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2026 Filing 7 Appellate fee was paid on 05/21/2026 as to Appellant David Morris Clayman. [Entered: 05/21/2026 03:18 PM]
May 21, 2026 Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Party David Morris Clayman. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10993] (ECF: David Clayman) [Entered: 05/21/2026 02:57 PM]
May 21, 2026 Filing 5 TIME SENSITIVE MOTION to reinstate appeal, to expedite, to expedite briefing, to appear in oral argument filed by David Morris Clayman. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [5] [26-10993] (ECF: David Clayman) [Entered: 05/21/2026 02:56 PM]
April 15, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant David Morris Clayman failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/15/2026 09:33 AM]
April 8, 2026 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney George Espy Doty, III for Appellees Chair, U.S. Federal Reserve, Comptroller General, President of the United States, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury, United States Congress and USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-10993] (ECF: George Doty) [Entered: 04/08/2026 11:24 AM]
April 7, 2026 Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by George E. Doty III for U.S. Department of the Treasury, et al Related cases? No. [26-10993] (ECF: George Doty) [Entered: 04/07/2026 02:10 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Clayman v. Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID MORRIS CLAYMAN
Represented By: David Morris Clayman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida
Represented By: George Espy Doty III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida
Represented By: George Espy Doty III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida
Represented By: George Espy Doty III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHAIR, U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida
Represented By: George Espy Doty III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMPTROLLER GENERAL
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida
Represented By: George Espy Doty III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida
Represented By: George Espy Doty III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?