Glenn Williams, et al v. Alston and Bird, LLP, et al
| GLENN L. WILLIAMS and BEST GEL PRODUCTS |
| ALSTON AND BIRD, LLP, ASHLEIGH HARRIS, BYUNG J. PAK, APRIL MITCHELL, RICHARD B. HAYES, KATIE HALL, BOB LEE, JOHN DOES and JANE DOES |
| 26-11116 |
| April 6, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Civil Rights Employment |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Glenn L. Williams failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/28/2026 09:15 AM]
|
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Christopher Carl Marquardt for Alston and Bird, LLP, Katie Hall, Ashleigh Harris, Richard B. Hayes, Bob Lee, April Mitchell and Byung J. Pak. Related cases? No. [26-11116] (ECF: Christopher Marquardt) [Entered: 04/21/2026 08:04 AM] |
| Filing 2 Best Gel Products is informed that a corporation or other artificial entity must be represented by a licensed attorney in this Court. [Entered: 04/07/2026 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Best Gel Products and Glenn L. Williams on 04/03/2026. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 04/07/2026 10:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
