USA v. John Potes
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JOHN ALEXANDER POTES |
| 26-11149 |
| April 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Returned Mail was received for Appellant John Alexander Potes. IN RE: 6/4/2026 DIS-1 Deficiency [Entered: 06/04/2026 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 8 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant John Alexander Potes. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files in the District Court a completed Transcript Order Form OR a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered. [Entered: 05/19/2026 07:58 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to William R. Barzee for John Alexander Potes. You have failed to file the CIP and failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 05/19/2026 07:57 AM] |
| Filing 6 Returned Mail was received for Appellant John Alexander Potes. IN RE: 4/21/2026 CRIM 1 - Notice of Docketing [Entered: 04/23/2026 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney George Espy Doty, III for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-11149] (ECF: George Doty) [Entered: 04/16/2026 05:15 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by George E. Doty III for USA Related cases? No. [26-11149] (ECF: George Doty) [Entered: 04/10/2026 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC Motion to appoint counsel as to Appellant John Alexander Potes was filed on 05/20/2025. Docket Entry 45. [Entered: 04/09/2026 08:29 AM] |
| Filing 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant John Alexander Potes on 05/20/2025. Fee Status: IFP Granted. USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appoint Counsel/Federal Public Appeal Specialist filed on 05/20/2025. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 04/09/2026 08:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. John Potes | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida |
| Represented By: | George Espy Doty III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JOHN ALEXANDER POTES | |
| Represented By: | John Alexander Potes |
| Represented By: | William R. Barzee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.