King Miguel Crayton v. The City of Opa Locka Police Department, et al
| KING MIGUEL EDDIE CRAYTON |
| THE CITY OF OPA LOCKA POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF OPA-LOCKA |
| 26-11183 |
| April 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Notice that no action will be taken on Certificate of Interested PersonsPremature appellant's brief filed by Appellant King Miguel Eddie Crayton. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): This case is closed. [Entered: 05/26/2026 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 12 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 10 ], Motion to reinstate appeal [ # 7 ] filed by Appellant King Miguel Eddie Crayton. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The deficiencies that caused this case to be dismissed have not been remedied. [Entered: 05/26/2026 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 11 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 6 ] filed by Appellant King Miguel Eddie Crayton. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): A motion to remedy the default(s) has not been filed. See 11th Cir. Rules 42-1(b), 42-2(e), and 42-3(e). [Entered: 05/26/2026 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant King Miguel Eddie Crayton. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [10] [Entered: 05/26/2026 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 9 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant King Miguel Eddie Crayton. [Entered: 05/26/2026 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant King Miguel Eddie Crayton. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [Entered: 05/26/2026 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant King Miguel Eddie Crayton. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 05/26/2026 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 5 Premature appellant's brief filed by King Miguel Eddie Crayton. [Entered: 05/26/2026 01:22 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant King Miguel Eddie Crayton failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 05/14/2026 10:14 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 2 ] filed by Appellant King Miguel Eddie Crayton. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing appears intended for another court. [Entered: 05/06/2026 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant King Miguel Eddie Crayton. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [2] [Entered: 05/06/2026 03:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
