Deanthony Jackson, et al v. Stephen Whyte, et al
| DEANTHONY A. JACKSON and ROBERT L. DAVIS |
| STEPHEN MATHEW WHYTE, JOHNATHEN GLOVER, LARRY EGER, 12TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT and MARIA E. CASTAGLIUOLO |
| 26-11206 |
| April 13, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Returned Mail was received for Party Deanthony A. Jackson. IN RE: 05/14/2026 Clerk's Entry of Dismissal [Entered: 06/02/2026 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 6 Returned Mail was received for Party Robert L. Davis. IN RE: 05/14/2026 Clerk's Entry of Dismissal [Entered: 06/02/2026 10:18 AM] |
Filing 5
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellants Robert L. Davis and Deanthony A. Jackson failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 05/14/2026 10:23 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Returned Mail was received for Party Deanthony A. Jackson. IN RE: 4/14/26 PLRA Docketing notice [Entered: 05/06/2026 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 Returned Mail was received for Party Deanthony A. Jackson. IN RE: 4/14/26 Docketing notice [Entered: 05/06/2026 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 2 Notice of Change of Address for Party Robert L. Davis. [Entered: 04/28/2026 10:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
