Michael Painter v. Denice Mckenzie, et al
| MICHAEL STEVEN PAINTER |
| DENICE MCKENZIE and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA |
| 26-11207 |
| April 13, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney David Riggs Walker, Sr. for Appellees Attorney General, State of Alabama and Denice Mckenzie. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-11207] (ECF: David Walker) [Entered: 05/22/2026 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to David Riggs Walker, Sr. for Attorney General, State of Alabama and Denice Mckenzie. You have failed to file the CIP and failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 05/22/2026 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael Steven Painter. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8] [Entered: 05/22/2026 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Thomas E. Drake, II for Michael Steven Painter. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 04/24/2026 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Thomas E. Drake, II for Michael Steven Painter. Related cases? No. [26-11207] (ECF: Thomas Drake) [Entered: 04/14/2026 05:14 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Warden McKenzie and Steve Marshall, Alabama Attorney General Related cases? No. [26-11207] (ECF: David Walker) [Entered: 04/14/2026 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Thomas E. Drake, II for Appellant Michael Steven Painter. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [26-11207] (ECF: Thomas Drake) [Entered: 04/14/2026 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-11207] (ECF: Thomas Drake) [Entered: 04/14/2026 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Michael Steven Painter was filed on 08/29/2025. Docket Entry 8. [Entered: 04/14/2026 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael Steven Painter on 10/07/2025. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines.--[Edited 04/14/2026 by CSG correcting NOA filed date] [Entered: 04/14/2026 09:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.