William White v. Seminole County Sheriff, et al
| WILLIAM A. WHITE |
| SEMINOLE COUNTY SHERIFF, RONALD SHAW, JOSEPH KLINGER, DONALD ESLINGER and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 26-11213 |
| April 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Jeffrey Kenneth Grant for Appellees Ronald Shaw, Donald Eslinger, Joseph Klinger and Seminole County Sheriff. The appellees' brief is due on or before 07/22/2026. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 06/09/2026 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 16 Notice of change of address filed by Appellant William A. White. [Entered: 06/03/2026 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 15 Briefing Notice issued to Appellees Donald Eslinger, Joseph Klinger, Seminole County Sheriff, Ronald Shaw and USA. The appellee brief is due on or before 06/22/2026. [Entered: 05/22/2026 03:12 PM] |
Filing 14
ORDER: Motion to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant William A. White is GRANTED by clerk [ # 12 ]. [Entered: 05/22/2026 02:36 PM]
|
| Filing 13 Notice of receipt: Notice to court as to Appellant William A. White. [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant William A. White. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [12] [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 11 Notice of Change of Address for Party William A. White. [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 10 Appellate fee was paid on 05/13/2026 as to Appellant William A. White. [Entered: 05/13/2026 03:19 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant William A. White failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 05/13/2026 10:09 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for leave to proceed [ # 6 ] filed by Appellant William A. White. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing appears intended for another court. [Entered: 05/08/2026 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Jeffrey Kenneth Grant for Appellees Donald Eslinger, Joseph Klinger, Seminole County Sheriff and Ronald Shaw. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-11213] (ECF: Jeffrey Grant) [Entered: 05/07/2026 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 7 Appellant's PREMATURE brief filed by William A. White. [Entered: 05/08/2026 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for leave to proceed filed by Appellant William A. White. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 05/08/2026 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant William A. White. [Entered: 05/08/2026 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party William A. White. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 05/08/2026 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jeffrey Kenneth Grant for Donald Eslinger, Joseph Klinger, Seminole County Sheriff and Ronald Shaw. Related cases? Yes. [26-11213] (ECF: Jeffrey Grant) [Entered: 05/04/2026 11:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
