Draper Woodyard v. Sheriff, Baldwin County, Alabama, et al
| DRAPER FRANK WOODYARD |
| SHERIFF, BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, WARDEN, BALDWIN COUNTY JAIL, TAYLOR, THREE UNKNOWN FEMALE CO'S and ONE MALE CO |
| 26-11315 |
| April 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Notice of receipt: Brief as to Appellant Draper Frank Woodyard. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN This case is closed. [Entered: 05/19/2026 12:06 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Draper Frank Woodyard has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 05/12/2026 12:51 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 3 ] filed by Appellant Draper Frank Woodyard. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The "three strikes" provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act applies to this appeal. The appeal cannot proceed until the full docketing and filing fees are paid to the DISTRICT COURT clerk. [Entered: 05/05/2026 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Draper Frank Woodyard. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [3] [Entered: 05/05/2026 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 2 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Draper Frank Woodyard. [Entered: 05/05/2026 10:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
