In re: Jason Pugh
Petitioner: In re: JASON WARREN PUGH
Respondent: STATE OF ALABAMA
Case Number: 26-11373
Filed: April 23, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2026 Filing 4 Amended MOTION Petition for WRIT of MANDAMUS filed by Petitioner Jason Warren Pugh. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [4] [Entered: 06/02/2026 11:52 AM]
May 4, 2026 Filing 3 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Petitioner Jason Warren Pugh. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [3] [Entered: 05/05/2026 12:18 PM]
May 4, 2026 Filing 2 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Petitioner Jason Warren Pugh. [Entered: 05/05/2026 12:17 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Jason Pugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: JASON WARREN PUGH
Represented By: Jason Warren Pugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: STATE OF ALABAMA
Represented By: Steven Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?